One thing is for Dam sure all the sweat equity my several generations family members would agree on is stop immigration dead in tracks NOW! And attack the real enemy who is encouraging & harboring this act THE EMPLOYERS! Its been going on for way to long!
2006-10-03 06:43:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by bulabate 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both sides have been destroying the constitution for decades. Don't pretend like the current attempt to listen to terrorist phone calls is the first attack on the Constitution in 200 years.
1 - There is no "separation of church and state" in the constitution. That is an incorrect paraphrase by the liberals to get morality out of our everyday lives.
2 - The Second Amendment has been under attack for decades. The citizens are supposed to be allowed to own guns and NOT the Feds.
3 - We are supposed to have free speech, but if I offend the wrong person with my viewpoint, I can be in deep legal trouble for my OPINION. I'm not talking about inciting violence or yelling, "Fire!" in a movie theater. I'm just talking about stating an opinion.
4 - Amendment 16 (income tax) was never ratified. The feds really have no legal right to take a huge percentage of our income.
Read the Constitution for yourself.
2006-10-03 06:28:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are so correct the way the first amendment interpretation has altered what they were trying to accomplish is horrible.
And they way the left screams for absolute security but doesn't want to relenquish any supposed 'freedom' is absurd. We were secure under King George but we weren't free. After the revolution we were free but we weren't secure. There is a balance that must be struck. We cannot have both absolute freedom and absolute security. Why the simpletons ask? I'll tell you --Because this in NOT Utopia and won't be Utopia until the human race is gone or evolved.
2006-10-03 06:41:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As an American (which i'm unsure you're, because of the fact you do no longer seem to have command of the English Language), i do no longer grant a flying turn what something of the globe thinks approximately united statesa.. Frankly, the United State's generosity of distant places places help, and the blood spilled helping preserve the liberty of others a recommendations outweighs any loss of 'savor' some wimpy Europeans and diverse jealous international places could have for us. in case you're an American, bypass decrease back to varsity and suggestions a pair of thank you to punctuate. Otherise, provide up annoying approximately what honestly anybody else thinks human beings such as you're indoors the seventh grade and an entire wuss!
2016-12-26 08:23:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pay attention to the supreme court, the constitution is a living, breathing document that is always changing to fit the demands of the people. As such, there's nothing unconstitutional. Therefore your argument last as long as it is popular. Welcome to the world of the supreme court.
2006-10-03 07:37:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in the constitution. Unfortunately, it's been repeatedly desecrated since FDR's New Deal.
2006-10-03 06:41:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. Constitution is interpreted in many ways. It just depends upon who is doing the analyzing. That is why the U.S. Constitution is not perfect as is our current administration and prior administrations. When you find Utopia please let me know.
2006-10-03 06:37:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by geewhizbaby2008 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In no way has the constitution or bill of rights been altered. Think before you emote.
2006-10-03 06:29:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, as the old saying goes.
The Constitution will only die if we let it.
2006-10-03 06:30:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
We need a better Constitution.
2006-10-03 06:30:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Roland D. 2
·
0⤊
1⤋