then we'd all be hypothetically imbalanced. (",)
2006-10-03 06:30:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by - 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Then there'd be no hypothetical answers lol
2006-10-03 06:29:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by fachizzzzle 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmmmm is this one? I guess there would be no hypothetical answers.
2006-10-03 06:29:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by snoop_dougie_doug04 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hypothetically speaking?
2006-10-03 06:26:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by stimply 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like Stephen Wright. Did you steal that joke?
2006-10-03 06:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Peter in La Jolla San Diego CA 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then there would be no need for scientist to see if they can prove it to be true or false.
2006-10-03 06:31:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Here I Am 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then life would be boring
2006-10-03 06:29:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Apollo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
then there would never be any stupid answers.........how boring.
2006-10-03 16:03:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Janet lw 6
·
0⤊
0⤋