Neocon spin is the only way for the right to respond to anything. They really don't know the facts, that's why they are Neocons.
2006-10-03 05:52:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rita B 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
You should have heard the Clintons and their Klingons during all their scandal investigations. They didn't recall anything. Clinton even failed to hand over subpoenaed documents.
So, why do you defend the Clintons?
As to your claims, the first one was debunked during the 9/11 Commission testimony. Just because known-fabricator Woodward claims something, doesn't mean you should automatically believe it. Hastert may not have known about the latest activity, but I'd need proof - the burden is on you - that he knew about it all.
2006-10-03 13:08:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Congress should investigate, what Haster knew and when. I don't' believe that he knew about the more explicit e-mails, or he would have done something about it.
On thing if found interesting, the age of sexual consent in Washington DC is sixteen. That would mean, that if there was an illicit affair, and if it was consensual on both parts, it would be legal.
That being the case, it would be no different then what Clinton and Monica did in the oval office.
One final comment. on the left and right of your key board, there is a shift key. If you use the shift key, you have the ability to Capitalize letters, and add punctuation marks. (Like I've been doing throughout this post.) By utilizing proper capital letters, and punctuation, you will be able to convey your thoughts, without looking like an illiterate idiot.
2006-10-03 13:01:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by eman12343567 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people just can't stand to ever admit they are wrong about anything. It's egocentrism at its worst. This includes everyone from Bush to Condi to every person still defending this disaster of an administration. It reminds me of people caught red-handed cheating on their spouse, caught in the sheets and trying to tell their other half "it's not what it looks like honey." Ridiculous and insulting.
2006-10-03 12:48:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When it comes to politics no-one is going to admit that they knew anything after the fact. It doesn't matter what party it is. When someone is caught in a bad situation everyone starts protecting their own as..s and suddenly gets a bad case of the if I had only knowns.
2006-10-03 12:48:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tammy G 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's the deny part of lie, deny, divert, repeat. The divert part is the 23 year old Stubbs scandal. Watch for the cycle to start over again.
2006-10-03 12:57:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by notme 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't remember what I had for breakfast, but I run one hell of a business. Leadership is long term memory skills, short term memory is for what we deem as trivial. Perhaps these matters seemed trivial at the time.
2006-10-03 12:49:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
They learned everything they need to know from the master of lying. You remember him, the previous President? Clinton lowered the bar for everyone!
2006-10-03 13:42:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called Plauseable Deniability.
2006-10-03 13:06:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They never remember anything, even after it's PROVEN and DOCUMENTED, the morons still don't remember. The truth is they just don't want to ADMIT fault and they have to look foolish trying.
2006-10-03 13:00:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kookoo Bananas 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Liars Liars pants on FIRE.
GOP IS a pack of Liars.
Aren't you used to that by now?
Err I don;t recall
Err I can't remember being told that
err I don't know who spoke Valerie Plames name.
Err I don't remember that e-mail.
err I'm not a crook
2006-10-03 12:48:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by cork 7
·
2⤊
1⤋