Do you think she would be more or less likely to exercise a military option?
2006-10-03 05:40:20 · 22 answers · asked by Fun and Games 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I can't base that on gender, we all know now a days women are quite capable of doing anything a man can do. And politics any one can do, even monkeys. I would have to meet this woman and see her views/attitude before i could answer your question.
2006-10-03 05:43:03 · answer #1 · answered by peze2 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
a female president would be less likely to use a military option. women are more concerned with life than ego.
2006-10-03 12:49:53 · answer #2 · answered by ralph e 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really that depends on the women i mean we all are so differnent!
some have mood swings some can hand emotional issues! and if we get a good female that runs and who has good things to offer us then i'm sure she would examine the current condishions at that time to see about the military!
right now we don't have a women up there so get to work!
;)
Mad luv
2006-10-03 12:50:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have several concrete cases where women used a military option !
Two famous examples :
Mrs Thatcher in England.... In the past
Mrs Merkel in Germany . Currently her Navy is working... in Lebanon
2006-10-03 12:55:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
About the same. People aren't going to elect anyone, male or female, who gives the impression that they're a wuss who will let the country get walked all over. Look at what happened to Jimmy Carter for an example.
2006-10-03 12:43:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Women have been in power since the beginning of time. Take a look at Queen Elizabeth I, Cleopatra, and Margaret Thatcher as a few examples. They were not pacifists.
2006-10-03 12:50:22 · answer #6 · answered by damdawg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will never be a female president. Only men can become president because he has to already be a member of THIS all-male secret and evil group that has been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2006-10-04 12:59:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not think the US is ready for a woman president. Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of why we shouldn't elect a woman. She is such a feminist and will have her feminist agenda ready to go on day one of her presidency. We need someone to develop and rule this country as a whole, not someone who will only concentrate on their own personal interests.
2006-10-03 13:06:10 · answer #8 · answered by nsupanda82 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Again with the myth of the peaceful woman. I have never seen any proof that women are any more peaceful than men. Being more risk-adverse does not equal being less violent.
2006-10-03 12:58:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
About the same. Any president finds out the story when they get in.
2006-10-03 12:42:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋