Humanist, nobody here reads anything, read their answers. They only watch movies.
2006-10-03 08:06:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have only read The Communist Manifesto and a biography of Marx. His ideas are a bit Utopian but were a necessary corrective to the heartless capitalism of his era. His conclusions are, I think, more applicable to a mass-industrial society with a large, oppressed proletariat (such as modern China) than the modern West - too few people in our society feel sufficiently oppressed for a worker's revolution to be realistic prospect.
It's possible that his prediction that states will wither away and be replaced with a classless society will happen eventually, but I think this could only happen if society became so wealthy that money became irrelevant as a means of distributing resources. This would probably reduce national governments to an irrelevance as they are based on financial control of their territories, although a legal system of some kind would obviously still be necessary.
2006-10-03 05:49:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Huh? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read much of Marx's published works, have some respect for his ideas and objectives, but have little respect for his poor attempts to interpret history, which effectively cripple his economic arguments. He seemed to know very little of human nature, and the science of economics has progressed far, far beyond Marx's rudimentary efforts. As a rule, one should not trust those whose ideas depend upon an ideal past or an ideal future, as such things do not exist; Marx's ideas depend on believing in an ideal future, which is clearly nonsense. He is important as one of the first to try to think on the lines he took, but others have subsequently done much better work on the subjects of history, politics, and economics.
2006-10-03 05:38:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by BoredBookworm 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Marx died over a century in the past, and that i've got examine each and every word he wrote it is attainable in German AND English. I understand people hate the philosophy that he and Engels concocted because of the fact of what the genuine government grew to become. Why they could loathe absolutely everyone who's in actuality a touch hopeful logician, I understand basically in those words. very like different Utopian philosophies, Communism had the smart project of folk who're inherently improper and in many situations corrupt. Capitalism has a similar difficulty! distinction is, for sure, while the state owns and controls each and every thing and has each and every of the means, blunders are magnified and amplified, and a genuine BEAST like Stalin took a organic, left wing philosophy and grew to become "The Communist Czar", basically he had plenty greater somewhat means. i ask your self specially circumstances what Communism could have become had Lenin lived ten years longer, or had Trotsky succeeded him. yet we've been heavily propagandized in the west to loathe something to do with Communism, and without somewhat information it, something liberal is categorized "socialistic" in this u . s . and attracts a similar form of ignorant vitriol. Neither Marx nor Engels ever worked in or for a Communist government, or ever even observed one. The prediction the philosophy could take private and earliest root in England proved to be incorrect, nonetheless Marx IS buried there. have been Marx revivified as we communicate and reviewed numerous what replaced into performed in his call, he could be revolted, too. that's what takes place while philosophies and ideology are placed into the hands of adult males with simpler and, generally, sinister agendas. apparently, Marx's center financial axiom--that one and all political and social action flows from capital (money) replaced into very arguable and condemned in the nineteenth Century, yet as we communicate, is virtually the popular clarification for any form of software or place. in the tip, that little tidbit ended up dominating the main remarkable and the LEFT!
2016-10-18 10:14:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not a fan of Karl Marx, but I do appreciate some of Friedrich Engel's other contributions (such as those to feminist theory), which are often overlooked because of his ties to Marxism.
2006-10-03 05:49:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read many of Marx's speeches. One book of his speeches I treasure was published by the Communist Party of India in 1947. Marx was before his time and unfortunately those that have come after have corrupted the ideals he was trying to lay down and they have used them for personal advantage. The ideals of Marxism were good, just as the ideals of democracy are good, unfortunately that breed of person we call politicians have their own ideals.
2006-10-03 08:31:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by bob kerr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Karl Marx can't just be read, because of the underlying theories within that mad mans mind. Studying the text with a group would be the best way to come to a conclusion of his writings. We read Mien Kampf and Marx like this as project in College, as to define Fascism.
2006-10-03 05:46:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rita B 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have read Marx some of his ideas are interesting but I disagree with his idea: from each by ability to each by need. However his ideas about value added do give pause to thought. That said I think most of the social ills of America are from the steady advance of socialism into our society that is taxing the middle class out of existence.
2006-10-03 05:36:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by FastFred Ruddock 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I lost any and all respect/interest in Marx, when I found out he was responsible for the death of his wife and child.
After Marx had sold all the household furniture to buy booze. His wife froze to death in the apartment. When she was found the baby which had died of starvation was clinging to the dead breast of it's mother, the wife of Karl Marx.
Sorry no utopia in this mans life
Go big Red Go
2006-10-03 06:12:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
People just hate what they hear but don't understand. Think about it, give Americans an American History test and more than half would fail, so what makes you think they know anything about Karl Marx.
2006-10-03 05:35:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have read some of Karl Marx. His ideas seem good execpt they don't take into account basic human nature, greed, lust, laziness. When human finally achieve perfection his system will work.
2006-10-03 05:33:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Fire_God_69 5
·
1⤊
1⤋