Its quite clear that they are creating their Bill of Rights. Look at the facts....
Against NSA program
Against SWIFT program
Club Gitmo, don't get me started on the 7-8 average weight gain, individual theormats in each suite, get to play soccer, free prayer rug and Koran or any other holy book to worship the god of their choice. Questioned in a lazy boy recliner
Also why do the Democrats reference the Constitution when we talk about how we treat priosoners? It's bad enough we gave them Geneva Convention protection, but now we're giving the terrorists amnesty and making them offical US citizens. Wacko Pelosi's speech the other day is a perfect example supporting my claim.
So if the Democrats are so against everything we do to prevent terrorism, how do they go about stopping it rather then offering no "solution" just critiscm. Or will they continue to work on the Al-Qaeda Bill Of Rights???
2006-10-03 04:45:17 · 11 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I agree with you 100% but wow, have you ever opened yourself up to some nasty answers. The libs and dems are going to attack you and the conservatives like crazy. Then again, that is what they do, they dont defend themselves by presenting alternatives or other ideas or solutions, they just attack and smear their opposition..
2006-10-03 04:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by J D 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
will never defeat terrorism by becoming like those we fight. The constitution is more, much more than a document to use (or abuse) as an internal road map here in the US. It is a document that for over two centuries has informed the world of who we are.
You blame democrats for not backing internal intelligence programs aimed at citizens of this country. I thank them for it. Eroding our liberty will not defeat terrorism. You point out the weight gain of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. What does that have to do with anything? The issue is holding people without charges and without trial. The United States does not do that. That is not who or what we are. It is what dictator run nations do. Your comment on amnesty must be aimed at the illegal immigrant situation. It doesn't take a genius to see that there really is a difference between a terrorist and an illegal immigrant. An occasional glance at a newspaper would also tell you that all of those supporting some type of amnesty are not Democrats and that all Democrats do not support amnesty.
Sadly your 'question' is just one more immature raving of a poor soul that has bought in to this administrations efforts to polarise our nation. Mature political discourse is so desperately needed if we are to win any battle with anyone. Your rant does not meet that measure.
2006-10-03 05:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by toff 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why is the Right so excited about the fact that people who spend most of their day in small cells and are fed calorie-dense food (and are force fed if they don't eat) are gaining weight? Well, duh.
Tell you what: You spend several years living in a small cell with no promise of ever getting out. Then I'll come visit you and THEN you can tell me how sweet life is.
You say:
"It's bad enough we gave them Geneva Convention protection, "
And that's all I need to know about a) your understanding of the issues and b) your moral standing.
2006-10-04 07:14:46 · answer #3 · answered by Zhimbo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You settle for simplistic recommendations to complicated subjects. The Sunnis and the Shiites have been scuffling with for hundreds of years. How will usa of america convey them mutually jointly as scuffling with different Arab countries (Iran, Syria, Sudan) besides as Al Qaeda from persevering with to destabilize the area no rely if US troops stay in Iraq or flow away? how can you alter the form of existence of the middle East who tutor their babies from an extremely youthful age that the u . s . is the super devil and that they could desire to hate and kill people? How do you alter people attitudes approximately Arabs? the answer isn't as undemanding because of the fact the politicians choose you to have faith. we are in a position to no longer basically "KILL" each and every Arab that we see and picture we are triumphing the conflict on terrorism. think of outdoors of the field, and don't enable the politicians B.S. you!
2016-10-18 10:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This looks more like an op-ed piece than a question, and it appears there isn't a real answer to it, at least one that you don't already know. In that spirit, this isn't really an answer, but just blather to scoop the two points. Have a good one.
2006-10-03 04:49:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mark Porter 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No but the republicans are too busy covering up scandals of their pedophile congress men.
2006-10-03 04:50:34 · answer #6 · answered by JS 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Are you saying that terrorists aren't human and that we shouldn't afford them basic human rights in keeping with international law and basic human decency? If so, I believe you are advocating war crimes.
2006-10-03 04:47:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You've asked stupid questions before but this takes the cake!
2006-10-03 04:47:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Thats why i dont trust them to protect us. bass ackwards.
2006-10-03 04:48:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It sure looks that way to me.
LIBS - WHY - they are trying to kill you guys too. Do you not understand this?
2006-10-03 04:52:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋