I think it's like Rosie O'Donnel calling Kate Moss fat.
2006-10-03 04:38:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by wudbiser 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush has made equally vengeful statements agains Chavez, so what is the difference? Bush has done an excellent job of isolating himself and unfortunately the US from many other countries of the world.
Bush has also done a great job isolating himself from many Americans. If Morgan Freeman chooses to agree with Chavez then all that means is that he's expressing his freedom of speech and opinion. Agree or disagree, he has the right.
2006-10-03 04:39:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stumpy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Chavez should be careful. If there is a devil, he'd be very unhappy about being compared to a moron like Bush. If everyone in the world who agreed with Chavez were to scream "Yes!", nothing else would be able to be heard for days.
People who support Bush live in their own delusional universe and will count for less than nothing by the time all this is played out.
2006-10-03 04:45:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by beast 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well I agree with him and is what most of the world think, maybe he could use a soft words instead of what he said, but I think the some way the same, but Bush is not the devil is just a little stupid puppet or a low category demon.
"Aqui huele a azufre aqui estuvo el diablo" lol
2006-10-06 08:10:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by otaku_125 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
how dare he come into our country and call Bush a devil?! THAT'S OUR JOB! he's just doing what no one in the democratic party has the balls to do (the only democrat that has balls rhymes with shmresa bleindz merry). OK, and bob Woodward. as far as Morgan freeman goes, who gives a damn? he's like Kanya west, a conspiracy freak (official term is conspiracy theorist). just because i happen to agree with them doesn't make them anything less than the morons that they are.
2006-10-03 04:50:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Eli 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
George Bush is an anagram for Beegorgush, which, if you know your history, is the ancient Samurian name for the devil, or as it was translated then, "he who lives below, the rancid one, that which smells of sulfur."
So, in theory, Chavez was absolutely correct, he just didn't unveil his discovery in a proper fashion. He should've provided more evidence.
2006-10-03 04:54:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
1.Bush isn't that smart 2. morgan freeman shouldn't be doing anything like that because it could back fire. 3. I am glad that another political figure call Bush out for what he is doing.
2006-10-03 04:45:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Karrien Sim Peters 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just a little dictator guy who wants a STEP up on the scale. I hate ACTORS who think they have a PULL on what people think, in these matters!. They seem to think they are always a sort of AMBASSADOR to save the WORLD.
2006-10-03 04:38:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by eastcoastxxi 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
He's just saying what half of the world already agrees with.
2006-10-03 04:44:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by stuckinamoment 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
BTW, it was Danny Glover. Chavez will get his when we are done with Iran.
2006-10-03 12:33:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
0⤊
0⤋