I've noticed that, whenever there's a scandal in the Republican Party, that there are some folks who will dredge up the last similar scandal involving a Democrat to try and show that it isn't that bad. Sex scandal? Pull up Clinton. Gay sex scandal? Pull up Studds or Frank. Alcoholism? Pull up Ted Kennedy. And so on.
2006-10-03 06:05:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? Because of Foley...lol.
Actually, to hear a lot of GOP groupies talk, you'd think the Foley case had something to do with Monica Lewinsky. Why is that, do ya think?
So it's actually fairly impressive that some of them are able to Google all the way back to the Crane/Studds scandals. Of course, for an exactly similar case of a GOP hypocrite being caught red-handed in a sex scandal involving minor males, you need go no further back than last year, when former Spokane mayor Jim West got busted trying to pick up teens on gay.com.
2006-10-03 04:37:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by jonjon418 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Except Dan Crane acepted repsonsibility for his actions and resigned his position.
Stubbs, like Franks, obtenately denied any wrong doing, saying it wsa nobody else's business. But crimes were committed by public officials, so it is every concerned voter's business.
FACT: Crane would have been removed from his position if Studds wasn't also implicated. The Dems buried Studds' transgression for a decade, only making it public after an investigation into the page system reopened Stubbs' case.
2006-10-03 04:47:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not hard to figure out really. They are desperately trying as hard as they can to convince people the Democrats are just as bad as they are. Truth is, the act itself isn't a Republican or Democrat thing. It's simply a person elected to office doing something bad. What is bad for the Republicans is they didn't handle it in an open way, or handle it at all for that matter.
I really hope that Hastert does not get away with the weak "I don't remember hearing about it" response. And speaking of that, don't you just love the "overly friendly emails" description they are using?
2006-10-03 04:38:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by toff 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Sure covers up the fact that C.Rice was warned about 911 and did not tell the 911 commission. She said she did not recall. Of course this story is berried by a 5 year old story that the republicans knew back then and just now sacrificing one of their owe to cover the Rice story. Just like the Ramsey story on the day wire tapping was stopped.
2006-10-03 04:38:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
you want to lead them to chop up, 9 years is an exceedingly VERY tremendous hollow in age. at maximum it really is going to be 4 years older than her. Your better 0.5 has each proper to be livid such as his niece. If she's no longer phased i'd recommend having her on accepted practitioner phil if this maintains. i imagine she's mendacity at the same time as he stated he grants it gained't happen again. She desires to offer up seeing him for good, it really is going to impact the relationship and the kin dynamics. communicate some sense into her head, she might want to probably get raped, settlement an STD off of him, get pregnant and a international of different opportunities from him. even i'd be worried for a 14 12 months previous, at that age they do no longer recognize what they are doing or what they are shifting into. He desires to be charged and booked with attack and life in penal complex till the day he dies. i do not intend to be harsh in spite of the indisputable fact that it really is the reality of it. firstly open verbal substitute it really is a tremendous portion of the kin dynamic, you want to hearken to her continually. it truly is important even at the same time as she brings living house a guy, you want to be instantly up together with your companions niece and say 4 years and that is it once you date a guy. any better of a area of interest than that we will sit down and communicate again.
2016-11-26 00:34:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The more they talk about foley , the more people with slide towards republican voting because people get tired of mudslinging politics, and abuse is a human trait not a policy belief.....but the will swing it to try to slam the republican party when there are many government officials, democrats and republicans who would fail a magnifying examination.......
2006-10-03 04:38:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's like a little kid whining "But mommy, he did it first!"
And I don't know about y'all, but MY folks raised me better than to use an argument like that. Doesn't matter what ANYONE else did, if I screwed up it was all on me.
2006-10-03 04:39:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by missusjonz 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
They're grasping for straws. It's a typical political ploy, on both sides.
2006-10-03 04:36:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
Diversionary tactics
2006-10-03 04:35:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lee 7
·
6⤊
0⤋