In the wake of the murders of these poor Amish children how heartless do you have to be to not want to rid the world of like minded people?Don't you know about the girl in India who was raped by her uncles and then was stoned to death because she was not a virgin anymore while they were not punished? I realize you don't care about others and think that it is not your problem but we are all humans and this is all our world. If you don't think riding the world of people like this and protecting the weak and inocent is worthwhile then you are no better than the other scum.
2006-10-03 04:01:12 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Exactually what I expected, people don't care about they poor women and children on the other side of the world, not their problem,,so sad..thanks for showing your colors
2006-10-03 04:07:48 · update #1
Also, terrorism hasn't increased, we are just part of it now.It has always been going on there if you bother to look, but again you didn't notice because it wasn't your problem
2006-10-03 04:10:45 · update #2
What is even more pathetic is this is the same attitude that was held during WWII when the states didn't want to get involved.They sat by as Hitler took over Europe because it wasn't their fight while the allies died.It wasn't until it came to their shores that they were forced to wake up .Do you really think people wanted to go to war then? Do you know after the fact that it was necessary? Do you know after the fact that it was the right thing? You don't need to answer that because we both know it was and if the States hadn't have joined and tipped the scales we would all be sorry just like we will be if terrorism isn't stopped.Take your heads out of the sand and , nobody wants war but sometimes you have to do the right thing before it is too late.
2006-10-03 06:44:30 · update #3
Concur. Justice is a dish best served cold and equally proportioned. Liberals don't get this. they just want to hug the criminals and hope they reform. Bush and those around him understand the necessity of dealing firmly and harshly with those threatening our existance.
2006-10-03 04:04:24 · answer #1 · answered by Jim from the Midwest 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem with your post is that there is NO evidence that Bush will, can, or even wants to change this kind of violence. Terrorist recruitment and international violence has INCREASED since Bush took office, not the other way around. How heartless do YOU have to be to want a man in office who invades a country based on lies and trumped-up evidence, does it so ineptly that he starts a civil war, and increases terrorism while telling you that he's trying to stop it?
2006-10-03 11:08:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the biggest murderer in the world, friend. Bush commits genocide on the populace at large. If you think Bush really cares about the "common" man than you are severely deluded. Bush sent thousands of our troops( our daughters and sons) to die for a "political" war on terrorism that did not even exist. No, my friend, the world needs to rid ifself of itself.
2006-10-03 11:08:30 · answer #3 · answered by icyhott4urmind 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we kill those wo kill others how does that make us any better. Anger begets anger beget anger. Killing is just more killing. While killing those uncles we are killing their innocent families. What the world needs in time like these is more love. This is not saying we don't care. This is saying Bush's approach in incorrect. We are at war with the kind of people who live in rage all the time. What do you think more rage will teach them? Nothing more than they already know. And more innocent people will die because of it. I hope more people like you and Bush finally get the message "make love not war" before it is too late.
2006-10-03 11:07:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I assume you can't be calling me scum since you know nothing about me. I just don't see any correlation at all between supporting Bush, who thinks nothing of murdering countless iraqi children, and this cretin who shot those Amish girls, other than they both have blood on their hands
2006-10-03 11:04:50 · answer #5 · answered by Eden* 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's the point of your senseless rambling? You want us to support Bush to be the world police? Sorry, let's work on our problems here at home.
Oh, and the Amish children's killer was not removed from society by Bush or anyone else. He blew his own worthless head off.
2006-10-03 11:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by Stumpy 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What does Bush have to do with this except helping de-fund mental hospitals which could house the criminally insane before they kill.
2006-10-03 11:04:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You sure have a poor argument to support Bush...many more people have died BECAUSE OF BUSH than died in the stories you mention...
2006-10-03 11:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by Mac 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a terrorist. ask yourself were you safer when Clinton was in office? I know I was everyday you hear in the news radio and everywhere else that we are surrounded with terrorist.WAKE UP AND STOP LETTING BUSH *#&*%# YOUR MIND UP!!!
2006-10-03 12:15:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
crazy ppl
2006-10-03 11:03:30 · answer #10 · answered by Henry_Tee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋