2006-10-03 03:39:22 · 33 answers · asked by Dicari 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Is a big mother......
(?)
2006-10-03 03:40:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
You're right, she should be using her celebrity money and status to make cheesy reality shows, throw useless vicodin parties, buy a thousand fur coats that kill animals for no good reason, pollute the ecosystem with a 550 car collection and fund rallies for cheating political figures.
What the heck is she thinking?
If I could, I would adopt half the world too. Just because she's an actress and beautiful and in the spotlight and has a tarnished past (who doesn't), those things do not make her heart and her intentions any less true.
2006-10-03 03:44:42 · answer #2 · answered by dbackbarb 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What is your problem? You seem to be angry or frustrated and its unhealthy. Just because she is a celebrity does not mean that she has no right to be a mother! If she wants children she can get tehm, and you are exagerating very very very very very much, you siad half the world, shes adopted what two kids? I know other peopl ethat have had and adopted more than that. and its not our place to judge if she is a good mother or not soley on the fact of her schedule and her lifestyle, there are plenty of celebs that have had kids and they have turned out just great. She is doing a good thing. Good Luck with everything .
2006-10-03 11:16:07 · answer #3 · answered by Carly 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
adopting two children certainly doesnt constitute as adopting half the world. so what if she adopts a dozen. she is giving children from third world countries, a better life, a chance at something that they would never have gotten otherwise. so why when someone high profile does something good, others try to beat them down for it. i dont approve of many things that woman does, but her humanitarian efforts are far more than what i could ever do. so kudos to her on that prospective!
2006-10-03 03:47:34 · answer #4 · answered by evanlah 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
a lot of women who experienced traumatic childhoods, or childhoods in which they were not accepted by their fathers, seek relationships with men that are not healthy and often times yearn to become a mother, actually DO become mothers, or have relationships with others that are co-dependant in nature, because they dont know how to relate to the world in any other way. they are still missing that lost parent, so have learned to become them themselves in some weird way.
as far as angelina jolie goes, i have only read some of her story. i dont know her personally, but i do believe that she has a good heart. i think that she also does have issues that have permeated her adulthood and particularly her relationships with men....but...i think that her intent is pure. i think she really does want to make the world a better place, and she seems to take a lot of that responsibilty on her shoulders. if we all did our fair share, however small or large, i think that the effect would be amazing. i dont think we would have nearly the amount of pain, hate and violence that we do now. it all starts with ourselves.
2006-10-03 03:45:07 · answer #5 · answered by echolily 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
C'mon, don't be a hater! She visited a few third world countries and felt she could help out a few kids - what's wrong with that? We can't save the world by ourselves, but I think it's wonderful that she rescued two precious children who will now have a chance to grow up healthy and safe, as well as get appropriate schooling! I applaud her!
2006-10-03 03:43:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who else is going to do it? I'm glad she's willing to lend a helping hand to others in need and to be able to adopt kids from countries that are starving and living in poverty.
2006-10-03 12:12:25 · answer #7 · answered by Tay-Tay 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What do you have against adoption? She's adopted two kids from other countries, so what??? It's wonderful. So what it she wants to adopt 10 more kids. You jealous or something?? What are YOU doing to better the world? your neighborhood, your family, YOURSELF???
2006-10-03 03:42:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have no idea why. I don't think she's a very good mother because she seems like a bad role model and influence. First off, she has way too much attention on her from the whole world which puts her children in even more danger. Secondly, the woman is not straight = bad influence. Thirdly, she has a career and still trying to promote "humanitarian" things. She can't possibly take care of all these and it seems things are falling apart for her anyway. I don't know why she want to adopt half the world, and so may different races too. It's strange and odd to me.
2006-10-03 03:42:43 · answer #9 · answered by Dayzi 2 · 0⤊ 7⤋
She's just weird like that. She's really into other countries and their way of living. Plus she has so much money she can afford to adopt whoever she wants. It's weird though. She is able to have her own children so why does she adopt? No one knows but her. C'mon she gave birth to her own daughter in Namibia. She's just weird like that.
2006-10-03 03:45:53 · answer #10 · answered by Pink Princess 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What difference does it make how many children she adopts as long as she is giving those kids a life that they would not have had any other way. I think it is wonderful.
2006-10-03 03:42:40 · answer #11 · answered by motheroftwo 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋