2006-10-03 03:38:35 · 9 answers · asked by japaneseidiot 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Bush is the bigger terrorist because he has the resources to spread his evil around the world. It's no wonder other nations are considering their own weapons of mass destruction as their only defense against the bully Bush - and the world's newest 'evil empire' - the United States of America.
Hussein isolated his reign of terror to his own country. Despicable? Of course!
Bush spreads his terrorism throughout the world, swaggering as some schoolyard bully ready to whip anybody's *** that won't tow the line. No wonder the U.S.A. is so hated!
Bush has killed 41,000 Iraqis for two reasons: his personal vendetta against Hussein, and Cheney's covetous greed for all of Iraq's OIL. Bush has killed 3,000 American soldiers without even having the decency to pay tribute to them as they return in flag-draped caskets to Dover, Delaware.
Bush & Co. should be tried in an international tribunal for high crimes against humanity, then tried in America for treason. If convicted, he should face a public firing squad. The same goes for all of the Bush administration "yes men", and all 535 members of the most corrupt, evil, contemptible, incompetent, cowardly U.S. Congress in U.S. history. These people are all evil. -RKO-
2006-10-03 06:32:50 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has to be Saddam. As far as I know Bush has not slaughtered say Alaskans or Texans whereas Saddam committed genocide on a large scale. I am still of the opinion that Bush went into Iraq purely because of the oil. In his mind he is protecting his people and their way of life which would diminish if their oil supply was affected. I do not think for one minute that he was concerned about the Kurds and other Iraquis nor that he had evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. However this does not make Bush a terrorist.
2006-10-03 04:28:47 · answer #2 · answered by david c 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is Bush, the real terrorist.
Saddam was a dictator, might have killed his countrymen. But, Bush, thinks he is a superman and wants to poke his nose in the affairs of all other countries of the world
2006-10-03 04:11:44 · answer #3 · answered by Electric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well...it is proven that Sadam commited genocide in is own country, & while Bush hasn't quite done that, I do believe that he is not worth the breath to blow him to hell...
2006-10-03 03:46:43 · answer #4 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no longer even close. the height of the battles in both Iraq and Afghanistan were even as the vast majority of enemy warring parties died. through some estimates, as many as 500,000 Iraqi squaddies and civilians died and yet another one hundred,000 Afghans lower than Bush. lower than Obama that's been extra smaller conflicts and IED's , drones which have performed the killing.
2016-12-04 04:11:06 · answer #5 · answered by silender 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Bush...but I'd have to say Saddam is far more evil than "W".
Bush has send thousands of our fine fighting men and women to their death in Iraq...but he has never killed thousands of Americans here in America.
2006-10-03 04:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush cause he is sending us soldiers to iraq so they can die and he knew about 9-11 before it happend and didn't do anything
2006-10-03 11:42:12 · answer #7 · answered by Zoe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam he gassed and committed genocide against his own people and against the curds.
2006-10-03 03:47:29 · answer #8 · answered by donangelo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DUH!.. bush of course!
2006-10-03 03:45:52 · answer #9 · answered by Shariq M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋