And the lack of publicity surrounding it. Had it been Clinton, the press would have never let up for a minute. http://www.gospelgrace.com/bush/bushrapecase/bushrapecase.htm
2006-10-03 01:37:07 · 15 answers · asked by Hillaryforpresident 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nice name BTW :) This is the first I've heard of this so thank you for bringing it to the surface here. I wouldn't put ANYTHING past Duhbya and his criminal administration. This is the most devious, sinister and duplicitous administration in history, some may disagree, but I'm basing my statements on the current global political climate. Remember this is a man who was busted for DUI and dabbled in Cocaine while his daddy was buying him his Yale education :(
2006-10-03 01:49:21 · answer #1 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 6⤊ 7⤋
You have got to be kidding! Get a Life! And, if you think the press picks on Clinton and not on Bush, you have been living in a hole somewhere.
2006-10-03 10:43:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think it is an allegation.
If it had any merit it would have been a media circus by now. The media may have bias one way or the other politically, but it all comes down to greed. If they find out they can't make a profit from it, they ignore it. In fact libel is something that you can lose a ton of money over in law suits. The media doesn't print lies out of fear of libel.
2006-10-03 08:48:09 · answer #3 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I knew about it, but could never find the links. Bush censorship you know. Bush has the Government in his pocket along with his herd of followers. I don't expect anymore to come of it.
2006-10-03 10:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
If there was any truth to it at all, the media would be all over it. There's no basis and they know it. Congress especially would be forcing the issue, except they know there's nothing to go on. Bush may be alot of things, but get real.
2006-10-03 09:37:01 · answer #5 · answered by HEartstrinGs 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Pure BS. Sorry but if there was any truth at all CBS, The BBC, and NBC, would be all over it. The main stream media is no friend of Bush's and no way they would pass a story of that magnitude
2006-10-03 08:43:25 · answer #6 · answered by mark g 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
do you really think that if the media had a smoking gun against bush they wouldn't demand action???? i mean the problem with conspiracy theories is that most of them are not planned out very well.. what is the saddest part of this whole thing is that you took the time to at least skim that long a.ss article... that is time you wasted.. you will never get that back..
2006-10-03 08:49:17 · answer #7 · answered by pain_made_me_beautiful 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
what do you think of the allegations that Clinton had an out of wedlock child by a black person? and what about Hillary's sexuality and have you ever seen Rosemary's Baby? if Chelsea isn't the devil's spawn I'd like to know how did she get to be so
UGLY!!!
2006-10-03 08:52:13 · answer #8 · answered by MizTeri47 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I imagine the press has not carried it further because upon deeper investigation found it to be baseless with no verifiable proof. Urban Legend.
2006-10-03 08:41:05 · answer #9 · answered by Tower of T 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
He has lied to the country for years and thinks he is beyond elite, he has never been made to answer for anything yet, why would he have to now?
2006-10-03 08:52:05 · answer #10 · answered by alis_n_1derland 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I read it
No vince foster type allegations on her death either
2006-10-03 08:59:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋