English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

obviously its something conservatives but what ???

2006-10-03 01:27:11 · 10 answers · asked by SUFI 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

for thereserose, yeah but then what would be the point of yahoo answers ??? and judging by your points on here, what would be the point to your life ?

2006-10-03 01:34:03 · update #1

10 answers

Neoconservatism is a political current and ideology, mainly in the United States, which is generally held to have emerged in the 1960s, coalesced in the 1970s, and has had a significant presence in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

The prefix neo- refers to two ways in which neoconservatism was new. First, many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism. Also, neoconservatism was a comparatively recent strain of conservative socio-political thought. It derived from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II, including literary criticism and the social sciences.

Irving Kristol,[1] Norman Podhoretz[2] and others described themselves as neoconservatives during the Cold War. Today, however, the movement's critics use the term more often than supporters. In fact, some people described as "neocons" today say that neoconservatism no longer exists as an identifiable movement.

Many associate neoconservatism with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard, along with the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Neoconservative journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and politicians, often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike, have been credited with (or blamed for) their influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

Historically, neoconservatives supported a militant anticommunism, tolerated more social welfare spending than was sometimes acceptable to libertarians and mainstream conservatives, supported civil equality for blacks and other minorities, and sympathized with a non-traditional foreign policy agenda that was less deferential to traditional conceptions of diplomacy and international law and less inclined to compromise principles even if that meant unilateral action.

Indeed, domestic policy does not define neoconservatism — it is a movement founded on, and perpetuated by an aggressive approach to foreign policy, free trade, opposition to communism during the Cold War, support for Israel and Taiwan and opposition to Middle Eastern and other states that are perceived to support terrorism. [citation needed]

Believing that America should "export democracy," that is, spread its ideals of government, economics, and culture abroad, they grew to reject U.S. reliance on international organizations and treaties to accomplish these objectives. Compared to other U.S. conservatives, neoconservatives may be characterized by an idealist stance on foreign policy, a lesser social conservatism, and a much weaker dedication to a policy of minimal government, and, in the past, a greater acceptance of the welfare state, though none of these qualities are necessarily requisite.

Most people currently described as "neoconservatives" are members of the Republican Party, but while neoconservatives have generally been in electoral alignment with other conservatives, have served in the same Presidential Administrations, and have often ignored intra-conservative ideological differences in alliance against those to their left, there are notable differences between neoconservative and traditional or "paleoconservative" views. In particular, neoconservatives disagree with the nativist, protectionist, and isolationist strain of American conservatism once exemplified by the ex-Republican "paleoconservative" Pat Buchanan, and the traditional "pragmatic" approach to foreign policy often associated with Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, which emphasized pragmatic accommodation with dictators; peace through negotiations, diplomacy, and arms control; détente and containment — rather than rollback — of the Soviet Union; and the initiation of the process that led to ties between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States.

Neoconservative writers have frequently expressed admiration for the "big stick" interventionist foreign policy of Theodore Roosevelt. In foreign policy, critics argue that neoconservatives tend to view the world in 1939 terms, comparing the threat from adversaries as diverse as the Soviet Union, Osama bin Laden (and, more broadly, Islamic extremism, dubbed Islamofascism by many neoconservatives), and China to the threat then-posed by Nazi Germany and Japan, while American leaders such as Reagan and Bush stand in for Winston Churchill. In this analogy, leftists and others who oppose them, are cast either as Neville Chamberlain-style appeasers or as an Anti-American fifth column. For example, Donald and Frederick Kagan's book While America Sleeps argues, at book length, an analogy between the post-cold war United States and Britain's post-World War I reduction in its military and avoidance of confrontation with other major powers.

As compared with traditional conservatism and libertarianism, which sometimes exhibit an isolationist strain, neoconservatism is characterized by an increased emphasis on defense capability, a willingness to challenge regimes deemed hostile to the values and interests of the United States, pressing for free-market policies abroad, and promoting democracy and freedom. Neoconservatives are strong believers in democratic peace theory. Critics have charged that, while paying lip service to such American values, neoconservatives have supported undemocratic regimes for realpolitik reasons.

The newly aggressive support for democracies and nation building is founded on a belief that, over the long term, it will reduce the extremism that is a breeding ground for Islamic terrorism. Neoconservatives have often postulated that democratic regimes are, on aggregate, less likely to instigate a war than a country with an authoritarian form of government. In support, they argue that there has been no war between genuine democracies anywhere in the world since the War of 1812. Further, they argue that the lack of freedoms, lack of economic opportunities, and the lack of secular general education in authoritarian regimes promotes radicalism and extremism. Consequently, the Administration has advocated spreading democracy to regions of the world where it currently does not prevail, most notably the Arab nations of the Middle East.

In addition, the neoconservative-influenced Project for the New American Century has called for an Israel no longer dependent on American aid through the removal of major threats in the region. Neoconservatives also have a very strong belief in the ability of the United States to install democracy after a conflict - comparisons with denazification in Germany and Japan starting in 1945 are often made, and they have a principled belief in defending democracies against aggression. This belief has guided U.S. policy in Iraq after the removal of the Saddam Hussein regime, where the U.S. insisted on organizing elections as soon as practical.

2006-10-03 01:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by Lady_Mandolin 2 · 0 0

Neocons are "new conservative". The other type of conservative is a paleocon, or "old conservative. Geroge W. Bush is a neocon and Pat Buchannon is a textbook paleocon. Neocons typically differ from paleocons in that they support a larger government than paleocons. Example is how Buchannon feels that the US should be more of an isolationist country and not have such a high trade deficit. Neocons don't have as much of an issue with having a deficit and spend more than the conservatives of old.

2016-03-27 03:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Neocons is a term that non-conservative Americans use to describe the new, young conservatives. They don't mean it in a good way either. Just another label.

2006-10-03 01:29:54 · answer #3 · answered by Vosot 3 · 0 0

Neocon is an American term. It is defined as a new conservative with hardline views and advocates on direct (usually military) action. This is in direct opposition to the new conservatives in the UK, which are more left wing than before.

2006-10-03 01:36:38 · answer #4 · answered by Bunglebear 2 · 0 0

Neocon = Republican party = GOP, it's just a slang term for the name nothing more. Liberal = Democrat which is the same difference.

2006-10-03 03:15:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

'Neo' meaning New Conservatives and referring to the group of politicans in the US Republican Party (Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove... possibly).

The term is used to differentiate them from moderate Conservatives (perhaps Reagan) in the administrations that they served in (Rumsfeld was secretary of Defence under President Ford.)

They are widely held to be considerably influential in the Bush governments (2000 - date).

2006-10-03 01:41:52 · answer #6 · answered by Richard M 1 · 0 0

A neoconservative: “The neocons and hard-liners have long felt that no Soviet leader could be trusted” (New York Times).

2006-10-03 01:32:32 · answer #7 · answered by kaz_bert 2 · 0 0

New Conservatives as opposed to the conservatives of old, mostly fiscally rectitude and lovers of freedom.

These lot are an anti-American cabal of criminals.

2006-10-03 01:29:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Short for new conservative, it is a take off of neo-nazi

2006-10-03 01:29:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well you can do the same thing I'd be doing and search the internet.

2006-10-03 01:31:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers