Indeed, the Supreme Court in Wisconsin v. Yoder noted this distinction when it suggested that “the traditional way of life of the Amish is not merely a matter of personal preference, but one of deep religious conviction, shared by an organized group and intimately related to daily living.”
From a normative perspective, too, beliefs are critically distinguishable from preferences. Religious beliefs and cultural commitments constitute aspects of our selves in a far deeper sense than do most personal preferences.
“The Amish account for a quite large proportion of all the religiously based exemptions to generally applicable laws that are to be found in the United States . . . . The Amish have prevailed at all levels of government. They have been particularly successful with State legislatures . . . have also won concessions from administrative agencies . . . [and] have created a central body, the National Steering Committee” to coordinate the group’s activities. Further, all of these efforts “take place against a generally well-disposed public opinion brought about by skillful propaganda, normally sympathetic media coverage and the desire of the public to delude themselves about the true character of the Amish.”
VR
2006-10-02 23:27:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by sarayu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, the laws of the country and state apply to them as to all citizens.
There are exceptions. For example, Amish children are exempt from state laws making school attendance mandatory when they have finished eighth grade and are 14 years old. They are permitted to work more hours than would normally be the case and to work during traditional school hours.
And as of 1965, they do not pay Social Security taxes. They take care of their own.
2006-10-02 23:15:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is a libertarian working on the republican value ticket. the difficulty is that no longer being into the socialist mainstream isn't conventional to maximum folk. And being a to blame baby-kisser (i detect it complicated to write down this however the fact is that he's) he's not searching for obscene media exposition and he's making use of the marketing campaign funds responsibly. however the version now could be that with the internet and the involvement of followers outdoors the occasion shape, Ron Paul is getting a large form of exposition. whether he does not win (surely, he's out at this 2d) he made a extensive replace in lots of that found out that there is a minimum of one baby-kisser in congress prepared to take a stand for liberty and the form. the explanation why he's not getting a large form of votes is that maximum folk worry liberty. i recognize it sounds harsh yet it is the way it is. human beings worry the duty that liberty implies, the actual liberty. you may think of which you're unfastened under a socialist regime because of the fact you may watch your widespread television coach with out censorship yet that isn't what liberty is all approximately. Liberty is the skill to make the suggestions to your existence freely and pay for the outcomes if any, be to blame for them. Socialism tries to create the phantasm which you're dealt with via a more suitable skill (the government) and you're con into renouncing to your selections, your freedoms, with a view to get that protection. that is a form of "polite slavery" or "social slavery" or "soft slavery" even regardless of the undeniable fact that that is slavery even regardless of the undeniable fact that. Ron Paul is a metamorphosis interior the splendid course, the upward push in help exhibits that maximum folk comprehend the could desire to take the skill from the federal government and return them to the states and to the human beings (10th replace). there's a lot you (and every person) could study him, verify his internet website and his checklist in congress. and are not getting me incorrect, i'm no longer saying he's the messiah or something like that. there's a lot approximately him that is a ways from my suited libertarian. yet he's the suited selection now.
2016-12-26 08:10:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by levatt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, there are a few exceptions, primarily with social security and insurance taxes, that don't apply to them, since they are more apt to take care of their own, than the rest of society.
...whereas most of society relies upon the government to take care of them when they get older, the Amish and other Mennonite communities have proven to the government that they themselves desire to wholly provide for their elderly, and do not want help from the government. And so, the government does not ask for such taxes from them, as they have proven themselves to hold true to their word.
2006-10-02 23:09:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by seraphim_pwns_u 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
no. they have their own laws.
i can't believe the media showing the amish people in the news broadcasts. they don't have their pictures taken because they believe it steals the soul. very wrong in my opinion. the media should take into consideration the belief system of these people.
2006-10-03 00:59:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
they are subject to the same laws as anyone.
as a culture that is cloistered,
sure they have their rules,
they are not just a religion,
but a way of life.
my heart goes out to them in all things.
2006-10-02 23:30:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by john john 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course, they're subject to federal and state laws like everyone, despite what additional laws they might impose upon themselves.
2006-10-02 23:07:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes.
2006-10-02 23:13:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
0⤊
1⤋