I for one would like to see that some of the real idiots out there that I myself have reported have been got rid of, instead of being allowed to give mean, racist, or downright sick answers...
2006-10-02 22:21:25 · 13 answers · asked by Dumbledore 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Too true, I have seen some really sick and offensive questions on Yahoo Answers, but even if they do name and shame them those sort of people with either get a huge kick out of it or just come back under another user name, most of those sick sort are already doing that now, you know who they are simply because they tend to ask the same sick questions over and over, maybe Yahoo needs to find more information out about them so they can stop them coming back on.
2006-10-02 22:42:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is a Data Base with all the details of anyone taken off from Q.A along with all personal details such as real name and ISP address,and of course reasons for being removed from Yahoo services.
There are some Criminal charges being brought in some cases,under the Telecommunications act here in the UK,however these do take some time to look into.
It would be illegal to name and shame these people and would not do any good.
2006-10-03 05:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by mentor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is complicated to tell what somewhat happenedbecause the airlines and the mummy are sharing conflicting comments. I particularly have a baby with particular desires and that i sympathize with the mummy and her baby...i myself do. the reality that the baby has autism, i don't have faith comes into play, here. There are rules on an plane and for good reason. The airplane basically can not take off except all of us is belted in precise..if the mummy could no longer ascertain that her son replaced into belted in, the the flight attendant has to take action. for sure, the baby could have get entry to to air shuttle with existence like accomodations...yet letting him roll around the floor isn't a existence like accomodation. Our daughter additionally has stress and airplane rides are complicated, so we supply her drugs. Her well-being care provider has never has a difficulty prescribing it. Face it, he wasn't in a eating place, he replaced into in an airplane and his habit replaced into opposite to the guidelines the airlines have set in place for the passengers' protection. particular some coaching on particular desires may be a good option, yet basically because of the fact a man or woman has a incapacity does not recommend they're exempt from rules. the guidelines that the airline replaced into enforcing (his seatbelt, the shop on, etc) are a similar rules they enforce for each passenger and there are very particular protection motives those rules are in place. no longer basically replaced into the baby endangering himself, he replaced into endangering the othe passengers. I vote for the airline. They did what they had to do to to make particular the protection of the different passengers. This baby replaced into NOTasked to flow away the airplane because of the fact he replaced into autistic..he wa asked to flow away because of the fact he could no longer stick to the guidelines for cover and his mom could no longer ascertain that he do so.
2016-10-18 09:55:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-10-02 23:09:40 · answer #4 · answered by Louis du Toit 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes what a good idea - but what about if they come back under a different ID? How do you stop that? possible further reporting if they in the same style of questions & comments?
2006-10-03 00:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by northcarrlight 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Too right - havn't seen a post from the offensive "person" from Kazakhtan in the last few days - would love to know if he is booted.
2006-10-02 22:25:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would take up way too much space! There are so many that just use answers for their sick and twisted pleasure, the list would be forever long!
2006-10-02 22:25:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Couldn't agree more. I know that this is a place to voice opinions and stuff, but some people take that advantage too far and should be named and shamed.
2006-10-02 22:25:56 · answer #8 · answered by Tish P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure they should, public humiliation works for me.
2006-10-02 22:23:49 · answer #9 · answered by Nyla 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they would never do something like that... but I liked your idea
2006-10-03 11:55:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋