I would pose naked for art, and I have posed naked for art, but only in the company of friends.
I posed for friends when I was pregnant, so that they had a real life model to help them draw the pregnant female figure. I have no problems with it.
There is no way that posing for art is porn!! There are some spectacularly beautiful paintings of naked people which nobody would consider pornographic!
I would prefer to pose for art, being an artist myself, but...
I would probably pose for science, too, depending on the reasoning behind it.
Why not?? If I can help either scientists or artists to understand the human body better - thats a step forward!!
:-)
2006-10-02 21:55:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Krissyinthesun 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either, but I would prefer art. At some point, probably soon, since my body is in the best shape it's been, I would love to pose for some tasteful, artistic, nude photos (done by a professional)... for me and the husband only, of course!
2006-10-03 10:22:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by me 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nude for science
2006-10-03 05:42:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither would I pose nude for. We have seen it all just turn on the television or look at playboy. That's porn. Why do you call it science or art?
2006-10-03 04:30:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Just me 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I would but for science only.
2006-10-03 05:31:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nyla 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either, I'm happy enough with myself not to be worried about being naked. My heart is arty and my brain would be of special scientific interest, so to get a good view either way they would have to cut me open for the full effect...
2006-10-03 04:50:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by CC...x 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
science
2006-10-03 04:26:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no coz a lot ve posed be4
2006-10-03 04:28:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by zum1001 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-10-03 04:28:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither i wouldn't pose nude for nothing...
2006-10-03 04:57:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by anna 7
·
0⤊
0⤋