*Although I shouldn't have to, I'll explain this now. I'm expressing an opinion, therefor the inferred question is for you to state your opinion to the contrary or in agreement. So please don't ask me what the question is.*
I'm frankly sick of hearing that. I'm tired of persons who don't understand the underlying principles of those their criticising, coming in and telling them how uncivilised they are. Many such persons have no problem condemning insensitive depictions of less advanced cultures as savage, yet have no problem going in and bemoaning my country, America, for example, as "uncivilised." They reason their positions so much from statistical data and not from understanding the importance of some issues to us, and others, that their views look aggravatingly condescending, sometimes asinine. A prime example, despite the claims, Americans aren't "uncivilised" for being about half pro gun. If you believe such, you are woefully ignorant and disrespectful of our culture.
2006-10-02
20:11:02
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
And of what makes us, us. You are not more civilised than me. Neither are you more enlightened. I don't want you censored, but I am telling you how I feel. I won't be looked down on.
2006-10-02
20:12:03 ·
update #1
Furthermore, to be civilised means more than to be a nanny onto oneself, but to have principles, resoluteness, and, yes, to be open. The measure of civility is in more in the totality of the reasons for why a culture is as it is than it is in how many people have died in a given week.
2006-10-02
20:15:04 ·
update #2
*is in more than
2006-10-02
20:19:28 ·
update #3
"The measure of civility is in more in the totality of the reasons for why a culture is as it is than it is in how many people have died in a given week."
The first in should not be there. Pardon typos. This has been a pet peeve of mine for a while.
2006-10-02
20:20:46 ·
update #4
I am dealing with it, by contesting with the basis. By deal, do you mean "shut up?" It seems so.
2006-10-02
20:24:14 ·
update #5
An an opinion can be wrong in the personal perception of another. If I was contesting solely the factuality of a subjective view, I'd address that. I'm expressing offense at a characterization that I find simplistic.
2006-10-02
20:26:45 ·
update #6