Stop redundancy
The Committee for the Reduction of Redundancy and the Antiproliferation of Repetition has decided not to meet until they have their first meeting and thus will not be meeting until the first time.
Their Pre-meeting Statement wanted to make this clear before they had their first meeting, so that it would not be unor confusing.
So their first meeting will actually be their first meeting and they will not have a meeting before the first meeting.
This should avoid having people show up for their first meeting before it is held, since to do so would be confusing to those who did so and this is what they want to avoid by reducing the confusion and lessening the repetition.
2006-10-02 20:09:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
42
2006-10-10 17:18:42 · answer #1 · answered by spongeworthy_us 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So that's why there was no decision. Well someone will have to flip a coin and pick a date after the committee decides heads or tails or we could use paper rock scissors and then there is where decisions, decisions this could take a while let me know when a decision is reached.
2006-10-03 03:34:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since you did not want to hold the first meeting till after you held the pre-meeting, we didn't sent out notices with directions to where the meeting was not going to be held. We did however send out notices that told the guest that the notices would not be sent out, and since we did not send them out, we included the directions that told them where they should not show up.
2006-10-03 03:18:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, what do I say to that . . . pretty interesting and I feel like I have a sense of deja-vu weird . . . .
*walked away, came back, read question over agian,*
Wow, what do I say to that . . . pretty interesting and I feel like I have a sense of deja-vu weird . . . .
2006-10-03 03:23:48 · answer #4 · answered by Resident_Psychic_24 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh you're just HI-larious. You should be on the stage.
Oh you're just HI-larious. You should be on the stage.
Oh you're just HI-larious. You should be on the stage.
2006-10-03 03:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, that's too much! Hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
( but you are so damn right ; that's why they (rulers) sucked our economies up!!!!)
Be blessed, mate aaaand keep the good work UP!!!!
cIAO............jOHN-jOHN.
2006-10-03 14:19:35 · answer #6 · answered by John-John 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
...........not to mention the maze of the bureacracy.
2006-10-03 03:12:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋