Which one is it and why and give examples
2006-10-02 19:38:23 · 11 answers · asked by nmikki2002 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
We dont dictate forgien policy.
2006-10-02 19:44:25 · answer #1 · answered by saturn 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"pax americana" as outlined by the pnac ..."the new american century" ... after the cold war the thinking was to make moves to ensure america stays on top strategically and economically and this necessarily calls for establishing a strong military presence in the middle east and controlling its oil as well as foster strong competition between defense contractors which benefits the military/industrial complex, and there is a coming together and competeing of a few different economic blocks ... all this generating strong financial gains to all sides involved in the process of subjugating any nation or group that is deemed a threat to the policies ... this includes iran and syria.
2006-10-02 20:04:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. maximum foreign places autos are geared up in u.s. by potential of people. "regardless of slow financial growth, the U.S. keeps to be the international’s greatest client industry and is the international’s genuine trip spot for foreign places direct investment (FDI). for this reason 1000's of foreign places companies have operations interior the U.S. to take great ingredient approximately this vast industry. This potential of foreign places companies making an investment interior the U.S. and bobbing up jobs is termed “Insourcing." we've factories and jobs that we are insourcing from different countries .. because of the fact we are extra cost-effective than another countries, like Honda autos, Toyota, BMW, Mercedes, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Nissan and so on. Others?
2016-10-15 11:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure what it is, but I do know it's not realism. Maybe it's not a foreign policy at all, maybe it's just a convient place to test new weapons technology and battle strategy?
2006-10-02 20:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by tee_nong_noy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think a democratic, since we liberated Iraq and Afghanistan, tried to implement a rad map for peace which includes an independent Palestine, convinced Kadhafi to give up WMD's and last but not least created stronger ties with Pakistan.
2006-10-02 19:45:43 · answer #5 · answered by Jose' 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To kill as many Arabs and muslims as it can get away with. Support Israel at all costs regardless whether right or wrong.
No, i am not anti semitic or a supporter of terrosism. Those are excuses used all too readily to commit atrocities in the name of self preservation. Absolute nonsense.
2006-10-02 21:37:11 · answer #6 · answered by dingdong 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intutions as in the case of Iraq, WMDs, George W bush had them
Confusions in the case of WTO findings, CIA and the MOSSAD, not confused, rest of the world is
2006-10-03 22:48:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is Killing-ism of muslims.
Why?
coz they are greedy people & want to capture others lands...
& assets...
& destroy them so that they dont get up & go against US & the US gets the power to rule the wold like hell!
Example:
The Oil form Iraq.
The dry land port in Afghanistan.
etc...
2006-10-02 19:43:35 · answer #8 · answered by just curious 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Find ways of not needing oil.
2006-10-02 20:00:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering "who's running the show" who knows?
2006-10-02 19:42:36 · answer #10 · answered by Jo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋