English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Brits, Germans, Italians, Belgians etc had colonies all over. However history showed that there armies suffered heavy loses. There civilian casualties were even higher. The countries colonised fought back for there independence despite there superior fire power. What makes Americans think that the countries that they are occupying illegally will take this lying down? It does not matter how strong the invading forces are, the will of the poeple is stronger and will eventually win. Americans are a few centuaries too late to try and dominate a people whos history goes back thousands of years. Bush has committed genocide in Iraq and Afganistan. How can two wrongs make a right.

2006-10-02 19:00:00 · 7 answers · asked by kalule 2 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

There's nothing more dangerous than an avocational social scientist neocon with power.

Bush and everyone he surrounds himself with all share the same personality trait that comes from a combination of:

power + arrogance + stupidity = every evil ruler in the history of mankind

On the group level:

power + arrogance + stupidity = organized religion

Bush believes that he is on a mission from God, possibly to bring about the Apocalypse.

He only cares about fulfilling this dangerous fantasy. He doesn’t care about America, Americans, Iraq, Iraqis or anyone, any country, or anything else.

He is a very sick little puppy.

2006-10-02 19:26:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Former British Prime Minister Margret Thatcher gave the idea some times back that English Speaking World should be recolonized ,I hope it is not her scheme that is being followed.But at this time all Sunni people and their Rulers are helping Insurgency in Iraq,their main enemy is Shites of Iraq and Iran.American politicians will never be able to under stand that culture and brotherhood.They will never be able to control this area.They should come out as soon as possible.Let them settle their own feuds.

2006-10-02 19:21:53 · answer #2 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1 0

Humm, an opinion of one individual. I of course do not accept as true with it in any respect, nonetheless I even have continually been slightly suspect over the moral checklist of mainland Europe and Britain, even nonetheless a great style of Europe does have a plan. we are of course continually attempting to make the better of any subject, so collectively as outspoken critics of the U. S. administration, our government nonetheless has considerable shares interior the attempt to maintain the peace in Afghanistan and education Iraqi police. humorous if Bush rather thinks "each and everything" is at stake in Iraq- if he did think of that way why did not he on the initiating do each and everything to make the line gold-paved for the Iraqis, make a circulate not basically to coach police, yet docs, instructors, engineers, plummers and so on. i'm constructive with 2 billion a week they'd do lots rather of in simple terms patrolling baghdad. Appeasment has by no potential been a coverage, even nonetheless it rather is considerable separate the political ingredient of an extremist group- the procedures which they use would desire to be terrible and unlawful, yet they'd not exist in the event that they did not have a great help base. it would be silly to overlook concerning to the politics and in simple terms "kill insurgents". yet i assume the U. S. is doing in simple terms that.

2016-10-15 11:21:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ROTFLMAO!!!!!! NO way George Bush is going to get that done. We have over 400 billion tied up in Iraq right now as it is, and Bush's best thinking has caused both wars to escalate worse than when we invaded both Afghanistan and Iraq. Now America does have a terrorist breading ground after 5 years.

2006-10-02 19:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 1 0

Are you really this stupid, or is your state run TV really telling you this crap. No one in America wants to Colonize any part of the Middle East. There is nothing there we would want. Cheaper to buy the oil than try to maintain control of a desert, where the indigenous people are going to kill each other if there is no one else to fight. Example- Shittes and Sunnis, Taliban and Northern Alliance, PLO and Hamas, etc.. etc.. If you guys would leave Israel and us alone you'd never know we existed unless your spending some of the millions we spend in Afghanistan, and Palestine for aid. We have all the sand we need over here on our beaches.

2006-10-02 19:08:30 · answer #5 · answered by mark g 6 · 1 2

Yes he does, and we have 13 military bases in Iraq alone. I don't think colonize is the best word for illegal occupiation though!

2006-10-02 19:39:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with aubry. I would have said it more diplomatically, but he is correct. The U.S. wouldn't even think twice about the middle east if not for 9/11 and the attacks against our allies. Also we have no intention of colonizing any country. This is a ridiculous fear.

2006-10-02 19:16:27 · answer #7 · answered by frogspeaceflower 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers