Just in case you thought I made that up:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/gop-hitman-matt-drudge-bl_b_30784.html
Matt Drudge blames the '16/17 year old beasts': audio clip
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/02/matt-drudge-blames-the-kids-for-predatorgate-they-are-16-and-17-year-old-beasts/
2006-10-02 18:11:05 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
GOP'er telling someone not to generalize that's rich.
2006-10-02 18:55:13 · update #1
That damn imbecile, Drudge! He's a full fledged moron that is the talking head for bush and company! Yes, those ******* have no limit as to how low they'll go to protect the reckless and perverted actions of sick pedophiles like Foley! Let's send the pedo. to a rehab for his drinking problem and all will be a-ok. Umm, what does Alcohol have to do with child molesting?! The republican party is full of these type of pervs.
2006-10-02 20:04:32 · answer #1 · answered by liberalthinktank 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The whole Foley thing was probably deliberately leaked, because it is a preferable distraction from what we should be talking about. Which is that Rice chose to ignore yet more 911 warnings in June, and that Tennant and Rice failed to mention this to the 911 Commission. It is becoming increasingly obvious that the 911 attack could have been prevented, and that this administration is criminally inept. They would rather throw one of their own to the wolves than face the consequences of their incompetence and inaction.
2006-10-02 18:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The worst component to that is that the certainly coverage component to the bill heavily isn't enacted till AFTER 2014. what percentage individuals are going to keep in mind that in yet another twelve months or so? interior a twelve months or so there'll be many wondering "wow, this isn't so undesirable, i assumed it develop into going to be plenty worse." for sure, once the authentic nasty elements of the bill kick in after the subsequent Presidential elections, it is going to likely be an exceedingly diverse tale. a lot for "disaster." and "we ought to bypass THIS NOW" The TAX component to it is going to bypass into result immediately even with the actuality that, and could very likely reason many small agencies to bypass out of commercial employer, and some more suitable ones as well that are already suffering in this very undesirable monetary equipment, making issues even worse as time is going on. keep in mind that the 2010 elections are coming and each and every unmarried seat of the homestead will be open, as well as a million/3 of the Senate. VOTE to get those human beings OUT.
2016-12-04 04:02:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I think it is to put the best spin possible on this tragic situation .Lets debate the laws and ages of those involved and the influence of alcohol and anything but the simple truth .This guy Foley is a sick pup no matter how you look at it and anyone connected with him is as guilty as he is .
This is the whole problem with America .
Some guy smoking pot is a danger to america and needs to spend five years in prison ,but a old perv can send messages to young boys of a questionable nature .
I would not of been suprised to hear Foley explain it was a test to see if the boys where on the road to homosexuality and need church intervention to save them from a life of sin .
2006-10-02 18:19:37 · answer #4 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They are so low they couldn't reach up far enough to scratch the belly of a snake. The GOP will pay for their wrongdoing, some already are. Some sooner, some later, all will pay for their hypocrisy. They say one thing, but mean the opposite. Beware, these are evil people, working to destroy everything we hold so dear.
2006-10-02 18:35:20 · answer #5 · answered by Schona 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny I was listening to Fox news today and all they talked about was how despicable Foleys actions were. Didn't sound like they were protecting him. Heard no Republicans of any stature defend him. I';m sure there is a few idiots that will try to blame the victim, but then there is the ACLU trying to protect the rights of sex offenders too. Does that mean that all Democrats (since they back the ACLU) like sex offenders? Don't think that would be true myself. Blame the SCUM that do these horrible things, not try to generalize about the whole party as if they were selling him the boys.
2006-10-02 18:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes, just sit back and watch the arrogance on the conservative news networks. I saw it all day long today on TV.
And the sad thing is that some people will see that and take their position- which defies logic and values.
2006-10-02 18:18:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am just loving all of this hypocricy of the Republicans. They are nothing but liars, sex deviants, theives and have no family values. Yet they all have a Bible to pray on.
This is great!! HAAAAAAAAA!!!!
2006-10-02 18:18:51 · answer #8 · answered by Gettin_by 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the gop'ers are just trying to get down with the dems.
there is not that much difference.
with foley gone, i say it is : 1 DOWN, 534 TO GO!
2006-10-02 19:35:43 · answer #9 · answered by arkie 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Incredible. There are no words for how despicable these people are.
2006-10-02 18:22:18 · answer #10 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋