English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No cherry picking the question, you can't blame Clinton(he's retired), your prez is in denial(hope your not too), w/o bashing or infantile rhetoric--- paaaleeeeze give me an example of what good you've seen other then fact that some of your party members are in or are going to jail now, are under inditement , or have yet to be indited. Fellow persons who understand who they are and where they come from would like to know!!!!

2006-10-02 17:06:50 · 10 answers · asked by scottyurb 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

Right! here is a party in power for over a decade and accomplished nothing, but defining the people not in power and polarizing poeple on issues that belong in church, not the senate. and now this presidency, the most crass and secretive, and unitellegible in the history of the US is surrounded by corruption, but the only thing that fox news and die hard cons can do it point fingers, blame and attack.

gimme a break, your stupidity is through in november - b*tches!

2006-10-02 17:13:24 · answer #1 · answered by ragajungle 2 · 0 3

I can go into the pitiful spelling, but I don't need to.

One thing I can say about our party that you can not say about yours:
1. When there is someone who seems to have done something wrong, and not just wrong, but BAD wrong, we do not back them, we just about force them to leave office. As your party has done.
2. We do not deny what had happened actually happened. As with what your party has done.
3. We hold our members to the HIGHEST standards, which your party has the Motto: "The ends justify the means!"

I think that should have explained it all... (If you have doubt, then check back when the exact same thing happened back in 1983. With the exception of there was actual sex between a page and a democrat member. Or even more recent, just before Clinton Left office, the democrats backed up one of their own for having sex with a 16 year old and was trying for a 15 year old before recordings finally got him in court. Up till then, they defended him to the tee)

OH, this also makes the point of why we have child porn and other child laws. This was known for at least 3 years. It is being used for POLITICAL purposes, not to protect the child!

2006-10-02 17:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by lancelot682005 5 · 3 1

If you had liberals to be proud of then you could taunt the cons by their lack of leadership. Guess what. Your dummycrats have no leadership, no plans and no hope so like most losers the old blame the other guy is needed to set up a campaign. Blaming others for wrongs instead of saying how to fix the problems is the same stuff that led to your party getting its butt kicked the last several elections. Good salesmen tell how their product is better, bad salesmen just say the other guys product is lousy. Get it??

2006-10-02 17:23:58 · answer #3 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 2 1

1. spell check. It's not hard
2. fact check. It's harder, but more worthwhile
3. Sweeping generalizations about all conservatives do your side a disservice and cause people on the fence to reject your ignorance
4. You are bashing and using infantile rhetoric
5. While providing no solutions of your own.

If you could kindly address the first 5 points, I'd be happy to explain conservatism to you. But until then I would be wasting my time. No sense talking to someone who won't give me a fair shake, and has already made their judgement of me before even listening to what I have to say.

By the way, there are liberals out there with solutions, and I would be happy to talk to every last one of them. Askthepizzaguy@yahoo.com

2006-10-02 17:11:36 · answer #4 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 2 1

askthepizzaguy said it all for me. I couldn't have said it better myself.

I'm a non-affiliated moderate conservative, and yes, I can (and DO) defend the Bush administration. However, your question does not invoke any desire in me to do so.
Your tone is accusatory, rather than inquisitive. I don't feel that you would keep an open mind about it. It's a shame, really.
This is why most conservative Republicans don't bother anymore.

2006-10-03 03:29:48 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 0

The spelling was kinda lacking, but nevertheless your correct in what your seeing with the Bush Administration. I could see just more excuses on this page, for being and supporting criminals that are being indicted. The Republicans don't have have any leadership due to trust, and criminal activity. I really don't even know who is going to be left to run in there party after they all end up in jail. Denial is just one of the Neocons problems over being delusional with their false rhetoric and propaganda. None of what they say, or produce is real!!!!

2006-10-02 17:42:43 · answer #6 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 0 3

very few would desire to have examine this questions and extremely few replied it nonetheless i'm additionally between them a citizen of u.s. earlier an Indian as we can not stay a citizen of two countries because of the fact being American resident we're not from now on Indian yet we can circulate to our mom land for ever and are unfastened to stay there too loosing all reward if we live longer i think of , each and every physique loves peace and hate a place the place there is not any risk-free practices . when I see terrorism is a international difficulty each and every physique would desire to play his or her functionality . whilst Malala a muslim lady can combat for education of girls ,whilst a baby needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and not unfastened from its outcomes ,an afternoon might come whilst human beings might come forward to wipe it from human minds even nonetheless it rather is in simple terms too previous due already , there are a great style of potential of destruction to wipe entire humanity if needed action isn't taken faster . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all style of violent movies would desire to be removed from media so as that we've not got get right of entry to to them by any potential . human beings can lease those varieties of movies for couple dollars and arise to combat with kin then to next neighbor then at paintings then someplace at procuring mall ,then everywhere he would not think of excellent brought about by potential of media and supplies he can get right of entry to from cafes and celeb greenback who supply this freedom so easily . Then we attempt to calm the recommendations that's already bombarded with lots unfavorable information around the globe .

2016-10-15 11:17:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sure- no acts of domestic terrorism since 9/11.

Al Qaida & Bin Laden hiding in caves. Hussein about to be hung, TWO DEMOCRATIC countries that used to be run by "head chopping" theocratic nighmares.

Go ahead- you'll find someone to SURRENDER to eventually...

2006-10-02 17:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by R J 7 · 2 1

The examples you give aren't regulated to the Republican party. I'm sure all parties have members who have done the same things. Our beliefs, and not our members, should be the dividers.

2006-10-02 17:19:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Learn to spell so your infantile rhetoric doesn't look so stupid.

2006-10-02 17:10:38 · answer #10 · answered by Emm 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers