Re: Mark Foley and Patrick Kennedy, respectively.
2006-10-02 16:14:37 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The first one, of course. DWI is bad, but not as bad as sexual exploitation of a minor.
EDIT - here is an email from asker.
From: Jack
Subject: foley/kennedy
Message: Thanks for your answer. But tell me, how is sexually harassing a minor WORSE than DUI? Kennedy could have killed someone. It's not likely that Foley would have caused a death by his actions (although I'm pretty sure he has driven while drunk before, but was never caught...). Thanks again. Luv Jack
MY ADDITION TO THIS ANSWER.
Why would you defend him and at the same time say that he probably is a drunk driver too? That makes no sense. I stand by my answer.
2006-10-02 16:24:40 · answer #1 · answered by Niche Jerk 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the two are undesirable, era. we've a great style of undesirable drivers that are actually not decrease than the impact of something different than great egos (get the heck off MY street) or being oblivious to their surrounding (Gee Officer, i did not see the semi). If i became into in cost, in case you're caught making use of decrease than the impact of drugs or alcohol, your motor vehicle gets impounded and you unfastened your making use of privileges for 6 months, no exceptions. Too many injuries, too many injuries, and too lots loss of life on the roads right this moment. autos have by no potential been extra valuable and safer. however the conventional of driving force right this moment is the backside I even have ever seen in my 30 plus years of making use of.
2016-10-15 11:16:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Two levels to this one. Sending lewd emails is worse than drunk driving, because it is intending to upset or harm someone. However, the consequences of drunk driving are not unlikely to become worse than the consequences of bad emails, because people get maimed and killed.
2006-10-02 16:45:59 · answer #3 · answered by cdrotherham 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
driving whilst intoxicated is obviously more physically the worst, as you may not only harm yourself but others too, possibly causing multiple death and or injury, whereas lewd e-mails to a minor can be easily traced and the perpetrator bought to justice without physical harm befalling anyone.
2006-10-02 16:19:56 · answer #4 · answered by a1ways_de1_lorri_2004 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah, being a pedophile Congressional conservative is not nearly as bad as a DUI. Foley is worse.
2006-10-02 16:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both are reprehensible. The difference is that Kennedy's crime is History while Mark Foley's crime is a Current Event.
2006-10-02 16:17:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I want to see what Foley is charged with before I answer this question.
2006-10-02 16:23:08 · answer #7 · answered by notme 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is this really going to be a which is worse argument?
Does it really matter do you in your heart want this guy writing the very laws that protect you?
Honestly , if this were your son would you be asking this question.
2006-10-02 16:20:07 · answer #8 · answered by withoutaname 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh gee, that's a hard one, pedophilia will get you hard time and driving while intoxicated will get you local jail time. I think it might just be being a pedophile.
2006-10-02 16:17:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
they are both very bad, thats similar to asking which is worse: rape or murder.
The answer is neither becuase they are both as bad as it gets
2006-10-02 16:18:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋