I keep hearing this rubbish being presented as PROOF that Bush's policies are effective because "there hasn't been a terrorist attack here since 9/11.
Well, applying that logic, I'd like to tell you about the snow prevention machine I invented last April. It's been in operation for SIX MONTHS now, and it hasn't snowed - Not one bit. So that means my snow prevention machine works.
Claiming that something hasn't happened (yet) is hardly proof of anything. Do you blind "patriots" (quotes = sarcasm) really stand by that argument?
2006-10-02 16:02:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
rightwinger, who on Earth is saying we should surrender? All I'm saying is that your president has lied to you repeatedly, and you seem to believe it.
Truth be told, I'm, in favor of far more aggressive policies than our current administration is pursuing, but one of them would not have been to attack a sovereign nation which had NOTHING - I REPEAT... NOTHING - to do with 9/11.
Hey - where is that fella we wanted, dead or alive, anyway?
2006-10-02 16:16:23 · update #1
No one can logically explain it to you because your absolutely right. Bush is an idiot who is only using the war on terror and 9/11 to gain political power. We should all realize this and collectively spit on him when it is his turn to enter the history books. Bravo to you for putting this out there.
And to right wingers response: It was a Democrat in office (FDR) during world war II, not a republican, so apparently we do know how to fight a war, we one the hardest and largest one in history. :p
2006-10-02 16:15:33 · answer #1 · answered by haha10488 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No you have made up your mind, you should watch South Park, there is an episode in which Eric tries to get Family Guy canceled due to their use of the prophet Mohammads picture. A professor convinces them the best way to fight the terrorists is to literally bury their heads in the sand. I think you would enjoy that episode because apparently that is what you have done.
Join the Democrats, they all agree surrender is the path to victory. If we would have known this earlier we could have defeated Hitler within months. I used to box in Golden Gloves, if someone as brilliant as you would have been around back then to tell me to throw int the towel in the first round I would be a retired heavyweight champion.
Cowardice and surrender will prevent new terrorist attacks, I am glad you have shown me the light. Bushes policies have turned the world against us, being alive cannot possibly make up for that.
2006-10-02 23:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The world hates us now more than ever because of Bush's actions (its all about the $$ baby)....hoping the next 2 years will fly by fast and that we can get someone in the white house to fix this mess we are in. Sad thing is that republicians and democrats are bedfellows so who do you vote for???
2006-10-03 01:01:40 · answer #3 · answered by Jaded_ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are not logical, so the answer is no. We've stopped attacks, and so has Britain. But that doesn't matter, and even if it did you'd still be comparing it to your "snow prevention machine". Boy Freakin' Genius. You've got it all figured out. We're proud of you.
2006-10-02 23:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush's policies have turned the whole world against us. God help us all if we ever need help from anyone besides good ol' England. It's gonna take YEARS to fix Bush's mess.
2006-10-02 23:06:05 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Heinrich the Great 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your logic is seriously flawed. Thereby causing you to get tangled up in too much analysis way above your ability to reason. Vote as you think you must. Leave the heavy thinking to those that have the facts and are able to interpret them.
2006-10-02 23:18:49 · answer #6 · answered by scubadiver50704 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No need to let those pesky results stand in the way of a good argument . . .
2006-10-02 23:09:48 · answer #7 · answered by szydkids 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your question is not sound . What argument ? Silly generalizations do not an argument make .
2006-10-02 23:07:46 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You answered your own question initially, but erred down the road. Be sure however, that we will get you soon !!
2006-10-02 23:05:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋