They act as allegories to illustrate certain truths, such as the boy who cried wolf. It wouldn't have the same impact if you just told people they shouldn't lie because no one would believe them when they really needed it. The story gives people something to connect with emotionally.
2006-10-02 16:06:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by strgoddss 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Gina,
Most myths deal with concepts of sacrifice for the many, or the struggle against evil. The stories of overthrowing a bad king, etc. Myths teach men and women to defend the weak, feed the hungry, etc. The super egotistical tyrants are brought down by the meekest hero.
They remind us to be better than yesterday. They instill hope and remind us to love each other.
2006-10-02 16:17:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They show us how early people explained and understood natural phenomenon. A good example is the origin of the seasons. Hades kidnaps Persephone and her mother Demeter won't let anything grow until Persephone is returned. Also, there is a Chinese myth about how the Milky Way came to be. The myths were also used to teach lessons.
2006-10-02 16:09:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Purdey EP 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is mostly because we tend to repeat the past. Even though most myths have changed over time, due to the fact that they spread through word of mouth, making myths important to our present day. They help us with crucial situations in life and are presented in a way that isn't so boring.
2006-10-02 17:24:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by ryrysofly11 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
thousands of years ago some one tied an apple on a string and tied it to a stick and pushed the stick in to the harness of a horse and he will start walking to get the apple and the Apple doesn't get any closer and the horse goes a little faster and you get the point, myths that we can do something keep us trying to do them even when we are failing we believe the myth
there are constent applications being used to alter the view of us, and our own perception
by the behavior sciences as enchanting and mystical
2006-10-02 16:32:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by bev 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
People can understand and usually are more interested in a story or tale than if you just said- you shouldn't be mean to those who are ugly or whatever. If it is told in a story, the point gets across much better and more listen and understand. So for society, we can pass down traditions, morals and values by doing this.
2006-10-02 16:10:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Goldylocks 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dawkins and Hitchens are basically (re)spouting previous doctrines which now compromise maximum of Atheism. in spite of the undeniable fact that it replaced into additionally the uncomplicated ideals of Freud and Jung. Blaming faith for all of the worlds evils. i've got heard it repeatedly back from Atheists of all kinds. this is the reason maximum Communistic countries banned Christianity, Judaism, and Islam too (for that rely) besides as persecuting such because of the fact the Dali Lama. Psychology watered itself down from Freud's (and his weekly circle of alternative brains who cohesed their collective study into one consumer-friendly philosophy) because of the fact Jung desperate to enable in spiritualisms back and subsequently we've been given 2 camps, which continued on until Sociology got here approximately, from the camp of Anthropology. Anthropology has to settle for the area faith performed in societies all alongside. And as a technology it could no longer basically paint them undesirable (basically.) yet Dawkins and Hitchens stand is an previous and familiar one. France went with the aid of an respected stand very like it in the 1490's and as much as i do no longer comprehend while. yet taking down the monarchy for the period of their Revolution replaced into as plenty approximately removing the Catholic Church (their theory of religion) because it replaced into finding out Democracy could do a much better activity for them. specially circumstances, while faith, or the incorrect faith, sits on the right, ordaining kings even, the persons can do better basically finding out each and every for themselves and/or their own family individuals. basically as a good monarch is super, a bad nationwide faith is evil. that doesn't translate into all monarchies do evil anymore than all religions are evil. Hatred of "G-d" and/or issues and persons dedicated to Him has been around in view that Cain.
2016-10-18 09:37:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is really use to find a commonality between people, It is a form of acceptances.
2006-10-03 05:42:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by kilroymaster 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
read anything by Joeseph Campbell
2006-10-02 18:50:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by cailincox 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It teaches us humility.
2006-10-02 16:18:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋