English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They seem to just be itching to wear burkah's, don't you think ??

2006-10-02 15:27:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

i dont know but i can think of some democrates that would look good in burkas.

hillary clinton is just one of them

2006-10-03 08:18:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Democrats: You will not win votes simply by throwing mud and not producing concrete ideas. Once upon a time, there wasnt much difference between Democrats and Republicans. Honestly, I believe that the Democrats have shifted further than the Republicans and Ive no idea why that is. Dont tell me you have a plan, show me. Show me why Democrats are better than Republicans instead of wallow in the mud of an alleged Republican scandal. Why? Because candidates have lost to dead opponents- and I would guess it was as much because they didnt trust who was left as the guy didnt earn their vote. Show me more than mud or we'll see you as no better than a pig, not a donkey.

2006-10-02 15:34:23 · answer #2 · answered by paradigm_thinker 4 · 1 1

Thanks for all you have done for the great rebooblican party. Thanks to you I will always be able to afford that fifth of Jim Beam and 1/2 kilo of cocaine for the weekend. I almost have atear in my eye heck,if it wasn't for you're great terrorists freinds, it might not have been enough for me to have Diebold in my back pocket in 2004. To the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, I LOVE YOU, MAN!!!! I'll always remember the great times we had, wasn't it cute the way I'd blame the demos for loving you, but then at night you knew I would be crawling into bed with you.


Dubya (sniff...sniff) hath spokith!!!!!!!!!! HAlalalalalaHaaahhhh wahhhh, why does our love affair have to end.

OH well see you in Guantanemo!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-10-02 15:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

No, but more than likely, if the Dems and Libs have their way, you'll be able to BLOW up the '08 elections!

2006-10-02 15:31:09 · answer #4 · answered by fearslady 4 · 1 2

Oh, how king of you. Guess you're another one of the ditto-heads who think the panacea to the world's problems is the liquidation of homos, Muslims and Liberals, right?

2006-10-02 15:30:25 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 2 0

and why don't you articulate one way they've given support and endangered us - as opposed to bush insisting islam is a religion of peace and bush destroying iraq and inflaming the middle east.

Are you aware that a lot of libs think all religions are pathetic delusions? You won't find any rooting for the spread of fundamentalism. (christian, muslim, jewish fundamentalism - all the same, scary, crazy stuff.)

2006-10-02 15:30:51 · answer #6 · answered by cassandra 6 · 2 1

Please don't lump us together with the democrats. They are relabeled Republicans that sell themselves to our constituency and then never give them anything except wars and taxes for defense spending increases.

This is a reply I made to a blog not to long ago describing the idea that Liberals continually make unfounded accusations of others being "blind".

"Liberals always talk about how blind all neo conservatives are. Quick to cite the stark increase in terrorism that the president has to defend himself from the media, such a gaping disparity that many more are blind to it. We don't need liberals controlling the country, what we need are people who can really see.

"I see violence being met with violence which will dictate our response of violence. It were as though Muslims do not want our idea of democracy and want to live under their ideal if Islam. Perhaps they don't even like having Israel actively occupying land that was theirs for over a millennium. They almost behave like all those millions of American Indians we gunned down or gave small pox! Why the heck wouldn't anybody *want* our ideals? I mean they are the most efficient means of governing and extracting profits from one country and putting it into our own pocket.

"That is exactly why we don't want blind people telling other metaphorically blind people how to run the country. I too am tired of Liberals simply accusing neocons of being "blind" without any reason with so many comprehensive perspectives available to them.

"However, I wish we could "see" the way a Muslim can. It isn't about hating Christians and Christians defending themselves. It has always been about helping other Muslims across national boundaries. We sit and wonder why men are killing nuns in Somalia as we sell bombs to Israel to blow up whoever they like. We don't even have to lift a finger! Israel is just fine blowing up its neighbors for a little lebenstraum. Ooops! That was in dreadful taste!

"But it is true. Abuse is met with abuse. We sold chemical weapons to Iraq in the eighties to use on Iran, killings tens of thousands of people and we wonder why Iran would ever consider us an enemy. Feigning innocence and pushing the envelope has worked in the past with men like Reagan, and we assume it will work again. Unfortunately, it will.

"I can imagine the next potential reply to this little blog I crept across by typing in keywords into Google. Perhaps talking about how they knew somebody at ground zero that choked to death in the smoke of the twin towers, and I am sorry to say I don't know anybody who died that will let me use their death as a platform for my ideology. You'll probably even point out the obvious grammar errors in my reply. All I have to say to you is that when you make a desert and call it peace, is it any wonder the world hates YOU?"

Okay, guy who wanted a "concrete plan" for reform. I couldn't give the necessary implementation for it in the allotted time (got things to do), but here is the gist:

1. Cut defense spending so we are proportional with the rest of the world on average for population and area of the country.
2. Withdraw troops to actually defend our country and not colonize another.
3. Nationalize industries that the government buys from to drastically reduce expenditure (everything from oil to office supplies, it has to be better than Halleburton).
4. Have a democratically elected, localized congress of citizens that vote on the level of corruption for all officials in Congress. Anybody found corrupt will be ousted.
5. Congress will very kindly cut their campaign financing and paychecks. Might even lose a few backstabbing assholes like Hillary Clinton (against gay marriage) and John McCain (for torture).
6. Completely nationalize hospitals. It worked for Canada better than Rush Limbaugh will have you think. If you are bleeding in the ER, they WILL take you (a lot easier than in American hospitals).
7. Eradicate all tax cuts for corporations that corrupt politicians gave out. Make them pay their fair share to compete in our market.
8. Nationalize raw materials industries (steel, lumber, etc.) to allow for better regulation.
9. Nationalize pharmaceutical companies so we can actually provide cheap drugs instead of giving Pfizer massive tax cuts for providing cheap drugs at an inflated price to third world nations and making a killing from it.
10. With all the freed up funds from nationalizing these industries, we can run at a loss in all of these industries and be able to provide foreign aid, fix our awful school system and introduce multiple languages (wouldn't it be nice to be trilingual?), end the high prices of raw materials, and get rid of some of the corruption all at the same time.

I'm sure somebody can try to shoot down each of those ten, as these situations are so complicated, they would take decades to implement. Just letting you know that there is a little continent called Europe that is doing most of the these things and doing quite well considering they were bombed to oblivion and run over by tanks just sixty years ago.

2006-10-02 16:10:11 · answer #7 · answered by Dick Nixon 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers