English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does this mean that when the dems say it was Carter that freed the hostages they are lying, because it happened on Reagen's watch?

2006-10-02 14:24:45 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

easly
Shawn S

its called doctored footage

2006-10-02 14:37:10 · update #1

15 answers

I can't wait untill the next president takes office, so he can
blame everything on bush.

2006-10-03 11:56:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

When people blame "Bush" there not directly pointing the finger at President Bush. What they're saying is that everyone holding federal political office is responsible for what's happened. This also goes for numerous intelligence agencies and other high up government organizations. While Bush could have stopped this if he had drummed up enough support, many many other could have too.

2006-10-02 14:27:40 · answer #2 · answered by The Savage Jaw 3 · 4 0

9/11 was planned back in 1996. Its not really any govt partys fault. Its all of their fault because america in general felt invincible. ever since 9/11 everything about that has changed. every time you hear about something catastrophic or terrorist-like, people wonder "was it terrorism??" that wasnt the case before then. we left ourselves open for a sucker punch that we got. england and other places in europe had been dealing with the same crap for yrs and we werent even able to tell the difference between iraq and iran

2006-10-02 14:29:08 · answer #3 · answered by Trojan8408 5 · 2 1

Iran didn't have contempt for the Carter administration. He was the only President to attempt a military solution to the hostage crisis after all.

Warmongering right wingers should be angry at Reagan for not waging war with Iran.

2006-10-02 14:30:47 · answer #4 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 0 2

"... all of us could desire to die to be sin unfastened as in step with Romans 6:7......." - If this have been genuine, the Yeshua died in ineffective, because of the fact - as quickly as all of us die - we "are unfastened from sin", precise? incorrect. Sin is the errors guy took after Adam's transgression. as quickly as the physique is burned, there exist no errors. Deleted. that does no longer mean WE DESERVE something, and in fact, as Yeshua stated, we "are slaves solid for no longer something" that need to die, because of the fact the only factor that the regulation brings in, is loss of life. After Yeshua's resurrection (the 1st one), many have been 'replaced' in an instant at their loss of life, and that 'corruptible' became into switched over into incorruptible. they're now in an abode with Him interior the homestead of His Father "the place there exist many Mansions" and that they're going to comprise Him "as in a cloud" while He returns along with his saints. people who He does no longer recognize as "His sheep" could could wait till the Resurrection on the tip of the 1000 years, the place there will be - for some - a Resurrection of existence, and for others a Resurrection of Judgment. the realm of those dependable to Him is the Universe, the Planets ("the stones of fireplace" initially given to the non secular creatures that later on rebelled against God). issues will return to the situations existent on the very beginning, lower back, and he will Reign as a King lower back. btw, you do no longer could desire to be a JW to verify the Scriptures and enable somebody enable you recognize what they mean. that is there for all, be unfastened. examine. learn, the fact shall make you unfastened.

2016-12-26 07:57:12 · answer #5 · answered by boynton 3 · 0 0

The blame game is a one way street with liberals. They actually believe that they do all things good and everybody else is wrong. If what you say is true (which according to liberals it won't be) Then yes Carter and Clinton both failed and big time.

2006-10-02 14:32:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

You are on some serious kool-aid. If you get your facts from somewhere other than an independent news source, you're gonna look like an ***. Semper FI.

2006-10-02 14:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by Jason 1 · 1 1

Al-Qaeda is "responsible" for it. However, the Bush Administration does bear some responsibility for failing to prevent it due to their disinterest in counter-terrorism prior to 9/11.

2006-10-02 14:28:43 · answer #8 · answered by JerH1 7 · 2 3

Carter didn't free the hostages. They waited until Reagan was in office as a sign of contempt for Carter.

2006-10-02 14:27:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

I thought Foley loved me. :-(
Oh well he's got a tiny dick and yeah! I do work out.

Foley is not a gay man he is a pedophile

2006-10-03 11:40:32 · answer #10 · answered by n2mustaches 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers