Unadulterated hypocrisy?
2006-10-02 14:06:10 · 9 answers · asked by manabovetime 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Maybe it's a case of "do as I say, not as I do".
Gun control is being able to hit your target.
2006-10-02 14:16:12 · answer #1 · answered by Jerry L 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They feel they are above the law. How many times do you hear her saying things like does X think (s)he is above the law. Or is it that she thinks her safety is more important than ours. I know it can't be that she thinks that, because our constitution allows private citizens to own guns, that we are the heaviest armed per capita country in the world. Switzerland is, not the US. There crime rate is lower than the US's.
All of this will not get her good press when she stands by some victims family & says I'll take guns off the streets by out lawing them for the private citizen. The press loves it. She gets lots of free campaign air time.
It is just like her Items on Renewable Energy. She knows that it will never be able to to compete with the energy that created it. When the energy that did create it SKYROCKETS now there can be competion. All the aging Renewable Energy infrastructure starts having a return on investment. What is it if one adds to the equation time value of money?
2006-10-02 14:27:56 · answer #2 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i believe you're asking if states should be compelled to understand a cover carry let from yet another. initially, i'm a large supporter of hid carry. i imagine that that's stupid all states do not realize different states' CHL. i do not imagine that the federal authorities has the legal authority (constitutionally) to modify a state's particular gun regulations. and that i truly do not favor the federal authorities regulating hid handgun licenses. That leaves the door open for Liberals (cough Obama cough) to unilaterally taking away my rights. i believe that possessing and wearing a gun are a suitable, even with the indisputable fact that the that's the present concern is you should have a licence to carry. i will %. my battles one at a time.
2016-12-04 03:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing necessarily inconsistent with being pro gun control and having a concealed weapons permit. For example, one can be opposed to allowing the use of assault weapons for hunting near a school (technically, pro-gun control) and still in favor of permitting trained individuals to carry concealed weapons.
I'm not suggesting that's Feinstein's position or that I support whatever her position is (I don't know what it is!) - I'm simply laying out an extreme that shows there is wiggle room there.
2006-10-02 14:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Feinstein does not know what he is saying he is dumb.
gun" are only as bad as their us-er so don't blame the guns blame the man or woman behind the gun
2006-10-03 15:05:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The day that criminals and gun control advocates are the only one with guns, we can assume that communism is alive and well.
2006-10-02 14:17:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bitches like Feinstein should be ousted for good. They are IN the pockets of the terrorists that is FOR SURE
2006-10-02 14:09:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It is alright for a politician to pack a pistol, but not your ordinary, law abiding citizen.
2006-10-02 14:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by eferrell01 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because they really aren't as stupid as they appear?
2006-10-02 14:09:33 · answer #9 · answered by Dane 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋