2006-10-02 14:05:32 · 29 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
George Bush gets the credit. Of course, this is the GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!
2006-10-02 14:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 10⤋
More importantly, who will get the blame when one of the illegals in this country decides to blow us up? We are sitting ducks right now and nothing is protecting us from getting exterminated! Thanks to the current administration who should have addressed the lack of security of our borders and ports in light of 9-11! This should have been priority #1. There is nothing more important than the security of your own people.
Who gets the credit for the terrible deficit caused by a reckless decision to go to war with a country who was no real threat to us? Now that there is a REAL threat looming (Iran), we have depleted our resources and military. Who gets the blame for not catching Bin Laden? Who gets the blame for not rebuilding New Orleans instead of Iraq? The list of the current administration's failures is too extensive to even go into here, but we all know who has failed this country!
Anyway, why are you so concerned with being critical of the liberals when the so called conservatives have done their best to ruin this country? Take my advice and forget all of this partisan poison. Concentrate on finding a candidate who will represent all the people instead of a certain sector next go round at election time.
2006-10-03 02:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by Marie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess you could thank old George for the deal he cut with Bin Laden. Maybe the deal was to take the blame for only one days worth of attacks then to lay low.. I suspect you will see another just before the election in 2 years.. Maybe part of the deal was the US will eventually give Iraq to Bin Ladden for all his loyal service. There is a reason that he isn't dead yet.
I don't believe that a super power can't find one guy living in the mountains with nothing but his feet and a cane and a video camera..Then again there isn't that many people looking is there?
2006-10-02 21:17:41 · answer #3 · answered by Shawn S 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Cheney. He hasn't had enough time to plan the next attack. He will execute the nuke in the U.S. before the end of this month so we will be sooooo afraid of the terrorists & vote for the Fascist Nazi Republicans. It will not work, & the Republicans will lose control of the house & senate. Then.... the impeachment proceedings will start & the 9-11 cover up will be EXPOSED.
2006-10-02 21:11:02 · answer #4 · answered by markredwing 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The corporations that didn't need another attack to keep you terrified and spending money.
Osama's mission was accomplished: we got out of Saudi Arabia.
Bush's mission was accomplished: the price of oil went up and Iraq isn't competing with his friends in Saudi Arabia or Texas.
Cheney's mission was accomplished: Halliburton has made billions.
Enron's mission was accomplished: We are now accustomed to high energy prices.
Why would we need another attack? Bush can't get re-elected.
2006-10-02 21:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Wake up already, 9/11 was an inside job. Have you looked at any of the hundred of reasons why? By the way, I am a conservative.
2006-10-03 00:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And maybe if the present administration was paying attention & read any of the reports presented by the CIA, we wouldn't have been attacked in the first place.
2006-10-02 21:14:40 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. Nightcall 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Which way is going to be hypocrite? You can't have it both ways. Are we or are we not being attacked every day in Iraq? Even on a good day your a moral whore.
2006-10-02 21:56:45 · answer #8 · answered by neo-liberal ultra conservative 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why bother? The conservatives are doing the work of the terrorists. Not much difference in sending American soldiers to Iraq or suicide bombers - they both die, both kill the opposition, and both kill their own people (intentionally or unintentionally). Less freedom in non-Democratic countries, less freedom in this Democratic country. Even government insiders are admitting that the U.S. is creating enemies faster than we can kill them.
2006-10-02 21:16:50 · answer #9 · answered by K H 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush and his sycophants accomplished what they wanted on 9/11
Only people like you accept the 9/11 farce commission
That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.
That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.
That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise.
2006-10-02 21:07:02 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
the CIA that Condoleezza Rice and the Bush team have ignored since before 9-11,,, we fight terrorism over there in Iraq so we we don't have to fight over here,, Bush has Saddam in prison,, his mission is accomplished,, the mastermind of 9-11,, Osama bin Laden is still free in Pakistan,, protected by the Taliban that he continues to train,,, if al Qaeda wants to attack America,, our borders are open,, our ports are open,,, we can't stop them from coming here,, we have to depend on our FBI,, National Guard and Police departments who have had major cuts in their budgets,,, if Bush is not held responsible for the attacks,, he can't be held responsible for the lack of them
2006-10-02 21:17:49 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋