Why is there a double-standard in the main-stream media when it comes to covering Democratic scandals?

Question

Imagine if Condoleeza Rice went into the national archives while the 9-11 Commission was investiging how the Bush Administration handled itself prior to the attacks and not only removed classified documents by stuffing them in her underwear, but actually destroyed them. This is precisely what Sandy Berger, National Security Advisor under Bill Clinton, did.

Answer 1

Being you MUST have been there-
give us all the details

Answer 2

Interesting that you would bring up the 9/11 commision which indeed was a farce...heres a couple of facts...
That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.

That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.

That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise.

Answer 3

You should be used to it by now.Why do you think the Democrats hate Fox so much? It is because they ask EVERYBODY the hard questions not just the Republicans.They don't call journalism a liberal art for nothing.

Answer 4

When your in the big chair the media loves you. Since when has anything been fair in politics? I'm kinda sick of bothparties talking to us like we're stupid.

Answer 5

Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it.

Coverage should be fair in both directions