English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-02 13:36:05 · 5 answers · asked by Michelle L 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

The Religious Society of Friends (commonly known as Quakers) began in England in the 17th century by people who were dissatisfied with the existing denominations and sects of Christianity. Traditionally George Fox has been credited as the founder or the most important early figure. The Society of Friends is counted among the historic peace churches. Since its beginnings in England, Quakerism has spread to other countries, chiefly Bolivia, Guatemala, Kenya, Peru and the United States. The number of Quakers is relatively small (approximately 350,000 worldwide[1]), although there are places, such as Pennsylvania (particularly Philadelphia); Newberg, Oregon; Greenleaf, Idaho; Birmingham, England; and Greensboro, North Carolina in which Quaker influence is concentrated.

Unlike other groups that emerged within Christianity, the Religious Society of Friends has tended toward little hierarchical structure, and no creeds.

Many Quakers feel their faith does not fit within traditional Christian categories of Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant, but is an expression of another way of experiencing God. Although Quakers throughout most of their history and in most parts of the world today consider Quakerism to be a Christian movement, some Friends (principally in the select Meetings in the United States and the United Kingdom) now consider themselves universalist, agnostic, atheist, pagan, or nontheist, or do not accept any religious label. This phenomenon has become increasingly evident during the latter half of the 20th century and the opening years of the 21st century, and is still controversial among Friends


The Puritans were originally members of a group of English Protestants seeking "purity" — further reforms from the established church — during the Protestant Reformation, though many later sought separation from the church

Originally used to describe a third-century sect of rigorist heretics, the word "Puritan" is now applied unevenly to a number of Protestant churches from the late 16th century to the present. Puritans did not originally, by and large, use the term for themselves. It was a term of abuse that first surfaced in the 1560s. "Recusants," "Precisemen," and "Precisions" were other early antagonistic terms for Puritans who preferred to call themselves "the godly." The word "Puritan" was thus always a descriptor of a type of religious belief, rather than a particular religious sect. To reflect that the term encompasses a variety of ecclesiastical bodies and theological positions, scholars today increasingly prefer to use the term as a common noun or adjective: "puritan" rather than "Puritan."

The single theological momentum most consistently self-centered by the term "Puritan" was Reformed or Calvinist and led to the founding of the Presbyterian, Baptist, and Congregationalist churches. The term was used by the group itself mainly in the sixteenth century, though it seems to have been used often and, in its earliest recorded instances, as a term of abuse. By the middle of the 17th century, the group had become so divided that "Puritan" was most often used by opponents and detractors of the group, rather than by the practitioners themselves. As Patrick Collinson has noted, well before the founding of the New England settlement “Puritanism had no content beyond what was attributed to it by its opponents.” The practitioners knew themselves as members of particular churches or movements, and not by the simple term

2006-10-02 13:46:55 · answer #1 · answered by mysticideas 6 · 1 0

Puritans were movers,
and Quakers were shakers !

Puritans moved out of England, moved to the american colonies and they were very picky and strict and tense.

The Quakers were settled, and they were very kind, compassionate, and friendly, and they let their spirits live till they vibrated or "quaked"

2006-10-02 21:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by million$gon 7 · 0 1

. the puritants werent open to any type of religion besides their own they saw any thing besides themselves as hethans. they saw them selves as the "elect" and believed in gods divine providence. they thought that idle hands did the devils work so they were always working. they thought that good luck was gods blessing and bad luck was gods punishment. quakers i dont know so much about but they were open to all religions and races. oh also the puritans left england to escape religious prosecution.

2006-10-02 20:50:34 · answer #3 · answered by n2ffn 2 · 0 0

mostly religios differences

2006-10-02 20:46:06 · answer #4 · answered by Grev 4 · 0 1

they only agree with the (U) (A) (S) (R)

regards

2006-10-02 20:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by Faisal F 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers