If President Bush had not been our President.Between Al Gore and John Kerry which one of these two men would you have put most of your trust on if one of them had been elected as our president?
2006-10-02 13:31:52 · 22 answers · asked by Mr Christian Ct 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Al Gore, Kerry is toooo much like Bush!
2006-10-02 13:37:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore he had proved himself already working w/ Clinton they left the American people with a surplus and a low deficent which is not the case today. I could go on but this was not the question. Of the two men I would take Al Gore.
2006-10-02 20:41:09 · answer #2 · answered by Lolo 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Kerry. having seen all the debates and being disappointed in Gore's performance vs W as opposed to Kerry decimating W in '04. A leader who can think on his feet without the crutch of yesmen and not sound like an idiot while representing all Americans is important. Also, it is better to entrust the decision to send our men and women off to war to someone who has actually in war and not shirked their duty to their country.
2006-10-02 20:42:40 · answer #3 · answered by Step into the Freezer 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mrs. John Kerry was/is the biggest problem to his career, and would have been an enormous problem for the USA.
Al probably would have been a better President, before he slipped a bit out of his mind.
How about Hilary this time?
2006-10-02 20:41:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore, he is intelligent, can speak english and has the common sense Bush wasn't born with.
2006-10-02 20:38:50 · answer #5 · answered by desert_kats 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why do you people ask these kinds of questions? If is a helluva big word to only contain 2 letters. as in " If England had won the Revolutionary War, who do you think would be our King right now?" What difference does it make? They both went for it, they were both losers, and they both lost, like losers do. Only an idiot would have trusted either one! hey, rphishin - Kerry's service record is a matter of public record, look it up some time.
2006-10-02 20:43:01 · answer #6 · answered by Darryl L 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That's a tough one, Al Gore takes credit for tons of crap and is boring in the extreme, or that boozer from Mass. who likes to kill prostitutes. Tough call, but that's usually how the cookie crumbles if forced to pick between two democrats. Either way, the end result is socialism, and socialism is evil.
2006-10-02 20:41:57 · answer #7 · answered by Eric578 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Gore...he proved in 2000 that he understood, accepted and was prepared to execute the Rule of Law. And he did so with grace.
2006-10-02 22:34:32 · answer #8 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to go with Al.
Remember, HE DID WIN? (the Popular Vote) By 500,000 votes. But a little thing called Florida ruined it for him. Remind me again why we have the Electoral College?
2006-10-02 20:43:56 · answer #9 · answered by Ed A 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mr Gore . of course anyone would have been better then bush, we should go with no partys. vote just for the person.and no lobbyists
2006-10-02 20:54:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋