Bingo!
2006-10-02 13:29:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by St. Hell 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Here is your answer. I am tired of writing it over and over again. You can read my 360 page and learn a lot.
I am sick and tired of the lies about why we went to war in Iraq.
1. We defeated Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War.
2. By doing so, we have the right to dictate the terms of his surrender.
3. Since we were the stronger power, what we say goes.
4. Part of that agreement was Saddam was to allow UN weapon inspectors unfettered access.
5. Saddam refused to honor this part of the agreement.
6. Saddam used chemical weapons on the Kurds in the North.
7. Since Saddam breached the contract, we did not have to honor ours.
8. War is on, we finished the job.
I do not care about whether WMD's were in Iraq. I know they were there. Saddam admitted it. The UN admitted it. Regardless of this, my statements above give us one legitimate reason to be there and this is enough for me.
Besides, we are there. We need to move forward, not focus on something we cannot change.
2006-10-02 20:34:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Why would he do that? Bush Sr wasn't that great, but he was 100 times better than his idiot son! Bush isn't even in charge! Hell he admitted that the only news he got was from his trusted staffers! That included the other idiot, Rice, who is WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE!! Another liar!
2006-10-02 20:31:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Start doing your homework. This situation begins over 40 years ago.
2006-10-02 20:52:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Hammy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol you wouldn't last 5 minutes in politics with a name like that. but no bush went to war to finish Saddam once and for all because of the threat it proposed to America
jimmy carter said it the same way.
2006-10-02 20:33:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Can you repost the questions in a manner that makes sense. I think you are on the right track but are a little incoherent.
Party On War Pig!
2006-10-02 20:29:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I don't stupidly speculate on questions that are even stupider than the process of speculation itself!
2006-10-02 20:29:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Masterwooten 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
No. And by the way, its spelled "nuclear".
2006-10-02 20:28:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ah Ha 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
you mean nu cu lar,,, Bush wants to bomb Iran now,, because there are attacks against US military every 15 minutes in Iraq,, his invasion didn't work
2006-10-02 20:31:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
How ridiculous....why start a new one...the Dem's covered this already...stay where you are..I'm sure they appreciate you there.
2006-10-02 20:30:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by CrazyCatLady 4
·
1⤊
2⤋