Condoleezza Rice continues to deny that she was warned about 9-11, do you believe her?

Answer 1

I's take her word over Bill Clinton's anyday.

Answer 2

Why the obtrusive answer is because a plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11. in case you've been fortunate adequate to work out the files short earlier it became pulled, it might were obtrusive that no longer some thing wearing a megaton of gas rolled for the time of that immaculate backyard and into the Pentagon. there became absolutely no longer some thing disturbed on the backyard and there became a large completely round hollow contained in the aspect of the construction yet no plane and no fireplace. As i have stated earlier, if the morons operating this madhouse are not inquisitive about a conspiracy, then they ought to offer up performing like they are. FDR stated "no longer some thing in historic previous takes position by skill of twist of destiny." And George Bernard Shaw wrote that "all tremendous truths start up as blasphemies."

Answer 3

I think it's unfortunate that you can't trust anyone in politics to answer honestly anymore, liberal or conservative. They seem to always choose their words to be as vague as possible, and as noncommittal as possible. It would be refreshing to have a politician who spoke plainly, and answered with simple yes and no's. When was the last time you heard a politician being asked to expand on an answer? Usually they have to be told to shut up so another question can be asked, since they just blather on about generally good sounding nothings that they are doing while they dodge any and all questions.

Answer 4

I fully believe Condi. Contrary to the lunatic ravings of the boobs on the Left the Bush Administration has been very honest with the American public. Liberals like to claim "Bush lied about this" or "Bush lied about that" but it's all nonsense and they know it. Also, I believe Condi would make an excellent president.

Answer 5

I believe her. I think history will view her favorably after Bush's term ends. It's a shame that the way everything is so politicized, and every single action or faux paux is used to "one-up" the other party, we are doomed to never get anything done in Washington. If you can't see how unbelievably unhelpful all the "right" vs. "left" talk really is...and take your blinders off...we are all in a heap of trouble. Bill Clinton isn't always honest, George Bush isn't always honest...and so on...

Now what do we do?...because our government isn't really helping us playing business as usual.

Answer 6

There's a difference between being told 5 years from now, on this day, this will happen;

and

Something might happen sometime, somewhere, somehow.

Well no kidding. It's only a matter of time before another nuclear blast takes someone's life. But knowing that won't change whether or not anyone can stop it.

Answer 7

Hell no.

She was the President's National Security Adviser back then. She had access to the NIE (the National Intelligence Assessment) as well to reports from all intelligence agencies.

What do you think??

Answer 8

Yes I do. She says there was lots of chatter/warnings about an attack, but that it could be in Jordan or Yemen. I don't think she believed it would happen in the US. No one did. That's why it happened.

Answer 9

MOST CERTAINLY YES, I DO.

Her denials of those warnings
have such strength and rigidity
that if you were to place them in
a line, end to end, at her feet,
she could walk across the Red Sea
on them.

Answer 10

There is evidence that she got a report that warned of planned attacks.

Answer 11

i think just because she saw a video maybe pointing out 9-11 doesnt mean she flat out knew it was going to happen and i also think sometimes people are a little hard on politicians