Was the 60 minutes interview and his book shameless anti-bush propganda or real journalism?
2006-10-02 13:21:57 · 11 answers · asked by charles l 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Real journalism, even if it doesn't conform to your outlook.
2006-10-02 13:24:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bob Woodward has written two favorable books on Bush so far - hardly something a partisan Democrat would publish.
He is a meticulous investigative writer - his ability to put together complex information and seek out concealed facts are without match. You can bet his book is documented fact - as the cascade of confirming witnesses attests, despite the denials from within the Bush administration.
Don't waste your breath. His reputation is solid.
2006-10-02 13:50:14 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
About the same time, Bill O' Reilly, Chris Wallace, Brit Hume, Sean Hannity and all the other talking hacks at Fox News did.
2006-10-02 13:24:35 · answer #3 · answered by Ed A 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Insincere
2016-03-27 02:41:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When was Bob Woodward NOT a pawn of the liberals?
2006-10-02 13:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think Bob stands by his observations. I am sure they are meticulously documentad and referenced.... un like Coulter or Limbaugh.
2006-10-02 13:28:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
When the democrats decided it was in their best interest to hand him some money and tell him to release a book slamming the Bush administration one month prior to congressional elections. It's dirty politics month...
2006-10-02 13:25:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anthony C 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Republicans can keep attacking the messenger,, and denying the factual evidence available to the public,, they live in this "state",, but the American people do not
2006-10-02 13:26:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Real journalism.
2006-10-02 13:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
just another liberal looking for the spotlight Woodward has no creditability and thrives off of propaganda
2006-10-02 13:24:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋