Compare President George W Bush and former President George H Bush or Ron Reagon?

Question

Which of these men had the best leadership experiance for our country's protection and working on seeking for peace with the world?How well do you think they took care of jobs in america?

Answer 1

Bush and Reagan are criminals, both who violated International law and committed crimes against humanity! Reagan was convicted in the World Court for Iran/Contra which he denied he knew about it for years, until we found the truth, and he finally admitted it!

Clinton left this country better off than he found it! He was smart, had a good personality, was well liked by world leaders, presided over 8 years of a great economy and actually balanced the budget, You can't say the same about any Republican in my memory! Including another Republican criminal, Nixon!.

Answer 2

Heyyyyyyy
All three of the last Republican presidents have lied to us about their dealings in the middle east and started wars there. However, Regan and Bush Sr didn't abridge our Constitutional Rights and they left the region with minimal losses. Our current President isn't more decietful than they and theoretically his intentions weren't any more sinister but that ain't saying a lot. He's just less succsessuful at being a War President.

Answer 3

Ronald Reagan:

1) Wasn't concerned with terrorism, as it hadn't developed during his administration.

2) With lots of help from a Polish pope and energized Polish citizens, he encouraged the break up of the former Soviet Union and its eventual transformation.

3) Basically anti union - broke the union representing the Air Traffic Controllers - thousands lost their jobs.

George Bush, Senior:

1) Wasn't concerned with terrorism, as it hadn't developed during his administration.

2) Sent US military to chase Iraqi army out of Kuwait but had the sense to keep his hands off of Saddam Hussein. He knew that Saddam was the only person who could successfully keep the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds under control.

3) Promised no new taxes then proceeded to raise them. Economy sagged during his administration and cost him reelection.

George Bush, Jr: a disaster of the first order - he represents everything that his father and Ronald Reagan were not.

1) Completely mismanged our reaction to 9 / 11. Instead of sending enough troops to Afghanistan to hunt down those responsible, he lied to the American public about Iraq's involvement in 9 / 11. Iraq wasn't involved in 9 / 11. Bush, Jr, really went there as a gift to his father because Saddam had threatened to assasinate Bush, Sr. Since the American public would never accept that excuse for going, he had to be dishonest and deceptive about his reason for sending troops there. All but one or two of the people involved in the 9 / 11 attack were from Saudi Arabia, by the way. No troops sent there - rather strange, wouldn't you say, until you examine the cozy relationship between the Bush family and the royal Saud family that runs Saudi Arabia - it's all about oil.

2) We are now less secure as a nation because of what Bush, Jr, did by sending troops needlessly into Iraq. Instead of quelling unrest in the Middle East, we are now responsible for an explosion of unrest over there. Bush, Jr, has recruited more terrorists during his term as president than any of his adversaries could ever recruit. Iraq has become a magnet for them - they are flooding in to kill our troops - like ducks in a shooting gallery. The longer we stay, the more they flood in. The Iraqi's don't show any interest in protecting their own country - they're too busy killing each other off (warring tribes). Why should they help themselves, when they have morons like us to do it for them ?

3) Lots of jobs created during the Bush, Jr, administration if you don't mind working at McDonalds. Tens of thousands of high end jobs have disappeared overseas over the past six years. In addition, we have no control over the Mexican border, so tens of thousands of low end jobs have also disappeared. Now consider the record debt being rung up every year - the Iraq war, alone, costs us $11,000,000 an hour. Now consider the impact that will have on the next generation - not very pretty.

Answer 4

They're all morons, but Dubya is the worst of the three. At least Reagan had the excuse that he was in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. George W. Bush has all of the mental capacity and selfish temperament of a spoiled two-year-old, but he gets his way because the majority of the morons who voted him into office are no better than he is. They're so stupid they think he's doing a good job, and that's the scariest part of all. I think there should be some sort of minimum competence requirement for voters. In fact I seem to recall seeing one about 30 years ago saying, "no idiot [i.e. no mentally handicapped person] shall be allowed to vote", or something to that effect, but it was probably repealed for being too politically incorrect. They should have at least kept something similar in effect to prohibit mentally deficient candidates from running, but I suppose then there would be no one left to run for office.

[Edit]
Actually some states do still have laws prohibiting the incompetent and insane from voting (see link below), but it clearly isn't strictly enforced, probably because so many go undiagnosed.

Answer 5

i'm an Obama supporter and those are my thoughts: i like Ron Paul even in spite of the indisputable fact that i don't unavoidably accept as true with Libertarianism and the 1st one to attempt that's going to in all probability see severe aftereffects and the assumption will bypass down in flames. i'm thirty years previous and this may well be the 1st election I vote in. I even have continually felt that there is a 2 party phantasm in this usa and the rich positioned who they like in place of work. It unquestionably scares me that Obama have been given so a strategies as he has and yet, he looks so genuine. How did he wreck in the process the duality? Ron Paul could have been a much greater advantageous opponent for Obama and could have made him sweat slightly. i don't be attentive to the way McCain is so extreme interior the polls whilst Bush grow to be so low. i assume human beings especially are stupid and that's an identical people who voted for Bush 2 situations! Republicans be attentive to in the event that they vote for Ron Paul that's going to likely be a wasted vote, that's why Independents don't get many votes. they're afraid in the event that they develop some balls and vote for him, that the worser of the assumed 2 evils gets the white dwelling house. till we can convince greater human beings to vote self sufficient and stay removed from the events, this duality will proceed.

Answer 6

W Bush and his dad are not even in the same category as Ronald Reagan, who although made some crucial mistakes was a great president. Few messed with him, he was a great speaker, he did not lead us into unfinished business that led to unnecessary war.

Answer 7

Ronald Reagen and the first President Bush both had a little common sense and were able to speak in public!

Answer 8

Ronald Reagan did what was in the best interest of our nation
..the same can not often be said of the others

Answer 9

ALL I care about is that Ron spoke about twenty times.in his speachs that he thought there are alien beings visiting earth,and i think they are doing all kinds of things to us. so i now only watch the skys.with my shot gun loaded.y;all

Answer 10

They are some of the best presidents we have ever had.