If The Hegelian Dialectic Read
Thesis +Anti-Thesis = Un,Natural + Natural
This Would Make The Full Equation E=MC Cubed And Prove
That The Fourth Dimension Exists In Quantum Physics.Making Man's Number Two And God's Four In A Multiverse Of Our Own ,Atom Splitting Creation.x
2006-10-02 11:54:03 · 12 answers · asked by Tommy D. 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
PLeAse; Don't Put Tooo Mutch eFfoRt InTo It KiDs, An oRigInal tHouGht MiGht BrEak Out.x
2006-10-02 12:13:44 · update #1
There is bound to be more to it than E = mc^2 because sooner or later someone will come out with another improved equation. This equation is an updated version of newtonian science. While newtonian science works well at low speeds it falls down at high speeds. This is where Einstein comes in. Sooner or later someone will find a situation where E = mc^2 fails and will come up with a new equation.
It will NOT be E = mc^3 because that equation is not dimensionally balanced. The units of energy are not kg m^3 s^-3, they are kg m^2 s^-2.
2006-10-03 01:37:47 · answer #1 · answered by helen g 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Un-natural+natural = U2n
But, Thesis + anti-thesis = (2thesis) - (-1thesis) + (thesis). (in the negative, squared), as its subliminal. (and the product must still be 1)
The number of the beast is 666, but the text was hebrew, then french, then old english. What was the contextual meaning of number, (as in ive got your number) and what was was the true mathematical value of evil, a root key, to the hexidecimal, dna tpye, strain, expressed as an algorythim?
2006-10-02 12:20:08 · answer #2 · answered by ben b 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obtuse questions in the Relativistic expanse of space. Uh huh, I think there is a question in there somewhere! This equation has yet to be entirely replaced with another, so for now, it is our best approximation. It is interesting to suppose that a Supreme Being made the universes for no other reason than it would keep his creation busy for millenia justing trying to unravel its mysteries.
2006-10-02 11:58:23 · answer #3 · answered by RHJ Cortez 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well it depends if the energy/matter relationships can be compared and added to to prove an equation that logically demonstrates God is another stage of energy/matter/god! which is a big illogic step in my opinion - poo sticks (felt too serious for a mo)
2006-10-03 01:44:01 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Gravy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stand near an atomic explosion and feel it's force.
You would not then say it was half the equation.
2006-10-03 10:03:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Gosh, I was just sitting here thinking that exact same thing myself.
2006-10-02 12:04:08 · answer #6 · answered by Hello Dave 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What the heck,that was complete gibberish!
2006-10-02 12:09:17 · answer #7 · answered by That one guy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
aww you type faster than me i was just going to ask if that was possible lol
2006-10-02 12:07:04 · answer #8 · answered by NetNet 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You silly old sausage, course not!
2006-10-02 12:01:53 · answer #9 · answered by Willis 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
E=my butt squared
2006-10-02 12:14:35 · answer #10 · answered by Henry 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋