English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How can we be sure there aren't more perverted republicans in local and national office?
The nerve! to know about his illicit activity and do nothing about it!
Than to blame the "leak" of this information to liberal media sources, tsk tsk.

2006-10-02 11:52:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

because being a deviant is really a requirement to be elected to office as a republican. look at our draft-dodging coke-head-in-chief.

2006-10-02 11:59:36 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan t 2 · 1 2

The majority of Republicans are not supporting him. I'm Republican and I say throw him in jail for a very long time where he can get his congigal visits by the inmate next door, whether he wants them or not. And most of the Republican politicians have been saying the same thing. In fact Dennis Hastert, Speaker of the House, was calling for a Judicial investigation into Foley.

But let me ask you, Where was the outrage from the National Organaization for Women when Clinton was taking advantage of his stature over an intern? They instead stood by the President and put their values on the back burner. It is this kind of hipocracy from the left that bugs me.

Trust me I am sickened and disgusted by what he did. And I am sure most Republicans as well as the rest of America is just as disgusted.

2006-10-02 12:08:35 · answer #2 · answered by monkey fuel 1 · 1 0

I am not a Republican, but there are probably some perverted Democrats as well. I refuse to excuse any of them for wanting political power so desparately that they would ignore this type of behavior. This is really a sad commentary on our leadership. Some of the parents knew and said nothing. This is even more disappointing. Their actions are probably fueled by the parents need for the prestige of saying that their child is a Page.

2006-10-02 12:01:53 · answer #3 · answered by Bean55 1 · 0 1

Same way Democrats can support Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, what is the difference except parties. They all have skeletons in the closet, but only the Republicans get drug over the coal pits by the national media.

2006-10-02 12:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by Cars 2 · 1 2

Republicans kicked him out. You missed that? You didn't know that?

Sexual Deviants like Studs, Frank, Kennedy, and Clinton were all supported by their Democrat Party.
Democrats love perverts if they are fellow Democrats.

2006-10-02 12:02:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is not just a one sided issue. There are many non republicans who do unethical and unlawful things, but the republicans sure know how to harvest them.

2006-10-02 11:54:54 · answer #6 · answered by Enterrador 4 · 1 0

Probably for the same reason "deviants", as you call them, in the Democratic party supported Clinton for his indiscretions and the people he pardoned for child sexual offenses. You've already forgot, haven't you?

2006-10-02 12:15:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

How do we know there are not deviant DEMONCRATS in Washington? This problem is not limited to one "side of the aisle". The big questions are why were these instant messages held for three years, who had them and who leaked them to ABC news?

2006-10-02 11:58:26 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 2

Party before Predators

http://www.alternet.org/

2006-10-02 11:55:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Why do Democrats support Drunks and Liars like Kennedy and Clinton ?

2006-10-02 11:54:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The Same reason freaks like you support perverts like Clinton.
And Jesse Jackson.

2006-10-02 12:01:02 · answer #11 · answered by scary g 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers