2006-10-02 11:17:28 · 22 answers · asked by remax93.angel 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Music & Music Players
The nano is better because although it doesn't support video format, you can download a different firmware for it on the internet that makes it able to play videos.
2006-10-02 12:43:00 · answer #1 · answered by chompizikstan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends. The Video can store more, bigger, better screen, play videos.
But the Nano looks cooler and smaller. And the Nano's battery last longer. Also, there's less corruption with Flash drive than HardDrive. It's cheaper, also. If you dont need videos and 2-4 Gb is enough, the Nano is definitely better. Cauz draggin along an Ipod Video is pretty uncomfortable.
2006-10-02 13:34:28 · answer #2 · answered by AlvaDaGansta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd probably prefer Ipod video. I've heard news about the Ipod Nano how the screen scratches pretty easily. I own a Ipod Mini, which I love a lot. Everyone is different, has their own tastes and opinions.
2006-10-02 11:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by Bobcat9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never used a nano but i can say that the video ipod is great and i love it
2006-10-02 11:19:09 · answer #4 · answered by hwall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ipod videos are less fragile (even tho u'll still need a case) and u can watch video on a video (which is still pretty thin if ur lookin for slimness) i say go for video, unless u have a tite budget with which i recommend a nano
2006-10-02 11:19:25 · answer #5 · answered by somepaliguy27 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nano is practical if u need it for music,but if u care for videos get ipod video,cause it has more options
2006-10-02 11:21:22 · answer #6 · answered by Halool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have the nano but I'd assume that the video is better.
2006-10-02 11:18:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
somewhat no longer shuffle. efficient its the main much less costly, in spite of the fact that it does not have a show, so which you will no longer be able to %. a diverse song you desire to take heed to, and which may be somewhat complicated. in case you have an remarkable form of songs, are not getting this one. The Nano is small and reachable. watching the iPod you may upward thrust as much as 4 GB. The show is small yet in color. this is all around fairly efficient. It gets fingerprints on it very, very, conveniently, in spite of the undeniable fact that. The video is in spite of the fact that, in actuality 50 money better useful than the 4 GB Nano, with 30 GB. So, 50 money for 26 better GB. in case you have an remarkable form of songs, and GB is significant, this is fairly precise nicely worth it. this is in color, and the show is rather shiny. in case you care bearing directly to to the flicks, its additionally a plus, and you will located your photos on there in its own area, rather of being linked to a song. The show is super and very efficient. My pal has one, and says it scratches up fairly somewhat, in spite of the fact that it comes with a sock like pocket ingredient to place it in. it is cautioned to purchase an more desirable efficient case for it in spite of the undeniable fact that. wish that facilitates, and have rather some thrilling on your holiday! stay guard, too.
2016-10-18 09:17:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ipod video
2006-10-02 11:19:45 · answer #9 · answered by greendayrox 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how many tunes/videos you want. The nano is pretty small. I worry about it getting lost....
2006-10-02 11:18:50 · answer #10 · answered by educated guess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋