people would not be educated, teachers would lose jobs, and only the rich and upper middle class would be able to afford to send their child to private school. Crime rate would increase, and we would be in a mess, so why the mumbo jumbo???
2006-10-02 11:14:34 · 4 answers · asked by james w 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
crime would increase due to lack of education
2006-10-02 11:21:54 · update #1
No public schools means all private schools. This creates competition in the field of education. The theory is that if schools are ran like businesses, you will get better service more efficiently, basically students will learn more, have better instruction, be provided with a higher quality education at a lower price. This idea is not really totally off base. Schools in many foriegn countries like Germany, Belgium, Japan, and France, compete for students. All of these countries have better education systems and smarter students than our country.
2006-10-02 11:33:37 · answer #1 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If government didnt pay for public schooling, schools would compete (capitalism) for students, lowering tuition price. Students would actually receive better education through competition and respect of society and other schools. People would donate to keep their schools prosperous, like private schools ahve been doing forever. Why would crime increase? I dont see the connection. What "mess"?
2006-10-02 11:20:19 · answer #2 · answered by Jon B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take a look at your question's first line, and tell me.
2006-10-02 11:17:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You may not be ok.
2006-10-02 11:19:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋