Not only are they expensive but their shyt looks like crap. You pay 100 bucks for a t-shirt that looks like it costs $10!
If you ask me, A&F has no style, it's all the same. Crust a$$ t-shirts and faded jeans. They have the same gay models in their advertisments and only young, high school, white people wear it.
It has nothing to do with being poor or rich. I'd pay $100 for a tommy, polo, or donna karen shirt in a second. But A&F???? I doubt it!
2006-10-02 11:12:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by s_sill 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I went to a school where everybody adored Abercrombie & Fitch and stuff, and I have to say... The style is seriously not worth that much money, because the originality in design, brand logo and even colors is not very original... So why would you pay for something that pretty much goes with everything but doesn't add or have much style on its own.... Besides don't you think abercrombie and fitch really overcharges compared to other stores such as american eagle?
Just because you have 80 bucks to spend or your rich daddy affords you a credit card, doesn't mean that you have to support the most conformist brand... What happened to originality and style? Another thing, alot of rich kids shop there, but that doesn't mean that they are bad... They are just being milked for their worth by Abercrombie/ AE/ Hollister executives
2006-10-02 18:09:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by mean. mode. median 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like the store but I only bought 3 shirts from there before & they were on clearence for 12.90, if it wasn't that cheap, i wouldn't got it. I'm upper-middle class, i'm not poor, but that's STUPID 2 buy a $50 shirt from there when I could get a cutter & better quality shirt else where for half that price. A&F shirts aren't mad to last that long, it's a waste of $50.
2006-10-02 18:32:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by native_american_chick 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
abercrombie can suck a dick...people get way too obsessed over it...when its just another brand name to make you spend more money...
personally i'm all for the comfort...i like cute stuff...but why waste the money when i can buy practically the same polo except it has a different animal logo on it for $10 instead of $30 or $40?
i totally agree with you...a&f sucks!
2006-10-02 18:11:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by fh4life92 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it doesn't matter to me the name of the store. If I see something I like then I buy it. If I don't see anything then I don't. One year I might not find anything in that store and the next I might buy ten things. I do like the guys Cologne in their though. It smell good on my guy.
2006-10-02 18:10:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by brunette 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i personally REALLY LOVE abercrombie.There is better stuff though. Like for example, id rather get designer jeans than abercrombie, at around the same price.
2006-10-02 18:34:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by jack 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hollister is okay (and american eagle)
but im not sure about abercrombie...it dosent feel friendly or there price isnt the worth...i think you can but more stuff whith that money and somthing WAY BETTER.
2006-10-02 18:36:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Grack 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
couldnt pay me to walk into that expensive a** store! i would rather wear adidas and nike sh*t. you know?! (since you classified yourself as 'prep' ill say im myself...people think im a "wigger" though cuz the way i dress, but adidas or sweatpants is WAY more comfortable to me!) im also in highschool
2006-10-02 18:03:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by sit down if you cant stand me 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree with jenna r. abercrombie is cool. i have a lot of stuff from there. but i know a lot of ppl that dont shop there and dont like it. so thats cool.
2006-10-02 18:09:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by jami 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i think its ok i like the designs and i wear some of the clothes but its not my favorite store
2006-10-02 18:52:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋