The covered for the guy, just so they wouldn't lose a seat. They've known he's been into kids since 2001
http://americablog.blogspot.com/
2006-10-02 09:46:44 · 18 answers · asked by martin 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ANyone who knowingly concealed or attemted to conceal the knowledge that Foley was attempting to have a relationship with a page boy should be arrested as a co-conspiritor .
Allowing a criminal act to occur is just as wrong as commiting the act yourself .
So my boss pays me 200,000 a year but he molests young boys .DO i turn him in and loss my job and salary or do nothing .If i do nothing someone should charge me along with him for what happened .
2006-10-02 09:51:52 · answer #1 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There is no real evidence of this as of yet. Your blog is NOT a reliable source. However I will say this people cover for people NOT parties! Hell at this point we don't even know what was in emails. we just know it was improper! The wrong doing on Foley's part he owns not his party! The GOP had nothing to do with his emails anymore that Democrats encouraged Clinton get BJ's while working in Oval Office! If that's the case then perhaps we should blame Democrats for Conduit and the death of Chandra Levey! This was the actions of a sick man not a party!
2006-10-02 16:53:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Tell me, how long have the Democrankies known about Fat Teddy Kennedy with a bottle of Scotch in one pocket and a pair of pantyhose in the other? How long did they know about Barney Frank's undue influence on congressional pages? How long did they know that William Jefferson was milking everyone in the world for bribes? How long did they know that John kerry lied abbout his service in the Navy and about his supposed medal toss? How long did they know about Billybob Clinton using the influence of his offices to have his degenerate way with Judith Extner, Paula Jones, Genifer Flowers and Monica Lewensky? How long did they know about the lies that caused Hillary Clinton to be the only First Lady of this Country to come under criminal indictment? (She & her bimbo husband make a great pair. Both indicted) yet these degenerate criminals still remain in their seats. That's the difference between Republicans & Democrankies. YES we're embarassed by Foley and we want him out of Congress and in jail, but the Democrankies have absolutely no shame at all about the crooks, perverts and liars in their ranks.
2006-10-02 17:05:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not at all. Nor do I think you should be embarrassed by T. Kennedy, P. Kennedy, B. Frank, Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, W. Jefferson, Robert Byrd, etc. I think this stuff happens everywhere, and would be shocked if it didn't happen in D.C. What I am not surprised by is the self-righteous attitude of the Democrats, and wonder if they are as concerned for the welfare of the intern as they are of making political points with something like this. Remember there is still an intern or interns out there that might have been affected by this, that seems to be getting lost in the political ranting.
2006-10-02 16:59:12 · answer #4 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeah, a blog is a real reliable source. And the answer is they didnt protect him, they told him to reisn as soon as they heard about the incident. Also, republicans arent protecting his political record, they are protecting his personal life. His whole life doesnt need to be destroyed because he made one mistake. Yes, he needed to be removed from power, but the conversations dont need to be released.
Also, did the media make a big deal when Ted Kennedy got drunk, drove over a bridge with a woman in the car into the river, then left her there to die, no they didnt. In fact, if i remember right, ted kennedy is still in office. Every party has scandals.
2006-10-02 16:48:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
What does his party have to do with anything?
If someone is a murderer in your state, does that mean that every person in your state is a murderer, or supports it?
He is an individual and a scum bag. His party affiliation is irrelavant. If people would stop playing retarded political games and actually try to fix problems, maybe we could get scumbags like this off the street sooner.
2006-10-02 16:50:28 · answer #6 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
My fellow American the problem is not about Republicans or Democrats, the problem is who we vote for in the coming elections. Human beings are not perfect we all commit mistakes and if you don"t believe me ask: Mr Kennedy, Mr. Clinton, the senator from Louisiana that kept all that money in his office freezer, etc. etc. etc. Oh by the way are they Republicans or Democrats.
2006-10-02 17:00:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
embarressed no. disapointed yes. but the results of the FBI investigation are not out . this may be a smear. its easy to manipulate emails and IMs. ask Jim W
2006-10-02 16:59:59 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, they are embarrassed that C. Rice never told the 911 commission that she was warned. But of course that got berried by the sex thing.
2006-10-02 16:53:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO!!!!!!!!! Are Democrats embarrassed by Barney Frank's asso ciation with the NAMBLA(Man-Boy Love
Association)
2006-10-02 16:55:12 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋