I don't understand those of you who answered 'no' to this question. Why not? E-mail me please and explain!!
2006-10-02 10:04:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by TW 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You think Republicans are the only ones with this issue?
try researching Gerald Studds...
Studds, Gerry Eastman (b. 1937) — also known as Gerry E. Studds — of Cohasset, Norfolk County, Mass. Born in Mineola, Nassau County, Long Island, N.Y., May 12, 1937. Democrat. Foreign Service officer; member of White House staff during the administration of President John F. Kennedy, 1962-63; legislative assistant to U.S. Sen. Harrison A. Williams, 1964; state coordinator for U.S. Sen. Eugene J. McCarthy's presidential primary campaign, 1968; delegate to Democratic National Convention from Massachusetts, 1968; U.S. Representative from Massachusetts, 1973-97 (12th District 1973-83, 10th District 1983-97). Episcopalian. Gay. First openly gay member of Congress. Censured by the House of Representatives on July 20, 1983, for having sexual relations with a teenage House page ten years earlier. Still living as of 1998.
2006-10-02 09:35:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by j H 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
we've war, poverty and crime issues- yet rather we are all meant to be dissatisfied approximately Politicians hiring and firing human beings over politics? final time I checked- those persons have been given their jobs first of all in line with their politics and contributions to campaigns- not their means or ethics, and final time I checked the two events do it, and function been doing it for years. Sorry- I in simple terms think of we've been given extra valuable issues to do then spend the previous couple of years of the Bush Presidency doing an identical element we did the previous couple of years of Clintons = Chasing political shadows and achieving not something>
2016-10-15 10:55:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No and why should it.? Unlike Congressmen,. Gerry E. Studds,Democrat from Massachusetts, who had a Sexual relationship with a male page ,and was re-elected in his Massachusetts district where he served until 1996,when he retired, Foley had not had a physical relationship but cyber fornication... Sick ...... Heck yes and Bravo for his shameful resignation... The thing is He did resign---- You Democrats re-voted Stubbs right back in.... :(
2006-10-02 09:52:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. I believe there are still good Democrats despite Byrd, Ted Kennedy, and Clinton, so why can't there be good Republicans despite the scandal with Foley?
2006-10-02 09:35:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Unless you are homophobic, you have nothing against this man. The legal age of consent in DC is 16. The page was 16. No sexual contact took place, only messages.
Foley did nothing wrong. No wavering faith, no scandal except what the media makes of it.
2006-10-02 09:29:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I have no Faith in Republicans its all about corporate greed to them all they care about is money and they hide behind the churches to make them look good they will get theirs in the end
2006-10-02 09:36:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by wise.cracker 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not at all. Molesters come in all flavors and persuasions. In his case, I'm glad he was caught. I expect if the truth is known there are many other pervs in Congress and their politics don't affect their thinking with their little heads.
2006-10-02 09:30:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Donald W 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
This has nothing to do with political views. If you're relying on one rep's emails to bring down the party, you'd better go back to the drawing board and think of a plan for '08.
2006-10-02 09:35:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by rustyshackleford001 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I have about as much faith in Democrats as I do in Republicans. Long & short of it is they are all human & they all do screwed up stuff, like committing sodomy with cigars and recieving oral pleasure in the white house. At least Foley fessed up.
2006-10-02 09:31:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
never had any,,, it is a disgusting fact that the fiscal conservatives in the Republican party see no difference in sex between consenting adults and a child sex predator,,, what the hell is wrong with these people,,, immoral behavior between the paid leaders of the people, and their subordinates is wrong,, but when children are involved,, it is a criminal act.
2006-10-02 09:44:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋