No--- why?
2006-10-02 08:34:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Uh, what 'white, heterosexist patriarchy'?
Perhaps you need to work on your own shortcomings before going around destroying a society you obviously don't see clearly.
2006-10-02 16:00:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, but a takedown of power should be done.
Basically, have no one on top... everyone's at the same level, that's the goal.
The only reason fox news has declared wars on christmas and **** like that is because there's already a war to take down this "white, heterosexist patriarchy" and they ain't liking it.
Anyway, you shouldn't be calling for the destruction of anything, they have just as much right to exist as you do, what should be taken down is their dominance over the others deemed "minorities" and everyone should be made socially equal.
2006-10-02 15:36:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by corpsnerd09 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
And replace it with what?
Why don't you guys start thinking about building things instead of just destroying what has kept us alive so far.
2006-10-02 15:36:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
no. if you mean white male power structure. everyone has the right to exist. their ideas and beliefs as well.
2006-10-02 15:36:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You sound like some kind of serial killer.Turn yourself in!!
2006-10-02 15:44:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
just the pink ones
2006-10-02 16:32:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,like all real Democrats,I believe there is room for all Americans.
2006-10-02 15:34:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I could attack them for you, just give a reason and the US will buy in just like they did with WMDs
2006-10-02 15:38:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
hmmm. ok white straight males who have families? be destroyed? no, thats a lot of people. why would you want them dead? do you even know what your asking?
2006-10-02 15:38:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by one glove 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Only if you mean the rich elite's ring of corruption.
2006-10-02 15:42:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Constitution 4
·
0⤊
1⤋