English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please include your ages and reasons. This is for a school project. Thank you.

2006-10-02 08:00:51 · 23 answers · asked by dimadee91 2 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

23 answers

I would be against it. Many 16 year olds have not had to hold down jobs, pay taxes, and support a household. Once you are old enough to pay taxes, you should be allowed to vote.

The only way I would agree to allowing the voting age to be lowered to 16 is if the 16 year old in question can prove that they work the equivalent of a full-time job (35 + hours per week) and plan to file a tax return in the next year. If not, they don't need to vote. The platforms for many of the political candidates are centered around taxes and other things that weigh heavily on the pocket. At 16, most kids are still trying to plan what lip gloss to buy or when they should hang out with friends. Not who's going to be in the senate or congress or the next governor.

2006-10-02 08:05:57 · answer #1 · answered by Meg...Out of Hybernation 6 · 1 0

To be perfectly honest most sixteen year old individuals aren't mature enough to make the educated decisions in order to vote. Also there are a lot of issues that do not pertain to some one that age. I think that some real world experience is necessary to make the right decision when at the ballot box.
age:25

2006-10-02 08:10:12 · answer #2 · answered by Mr M 2 · 2 0

No. The average teenager is not interested enough in politics and will be more likely to be very misinformed, and/or have their votes easier influenced by the media that already bombards them.

That is, even if they bother to vote at all anyway.
Plus. the politicans won't give a crap about the younger voters anyway, they're very much too concerned about the votes of the elderly, who vote more frequently than any other age bracket.

I'm 22.

2006-10-02 08:04:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'd be for having 16-year-olds vote!! I'm 16 and well I'd like to vote but I can't!! I think that it's unfair because you can drive legally at 16 but a small task of voting you have to be 18!?! It's like saying I'd rather give a 16 year old a car and see if they don't kill someone but just going to vote is too much for them to handle?? It just doesn't make sense!!

2006-10-02 08:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by katiekat1300 2 · 0 0

Against it.
I believe they are (with some exceptions) just beginning to understand what the whole process means. There's the whole peer pressure thing, one might not know the facts about a candidate but will go along with everyone else.Not there aren't some adults who do the same thing.. The youth need to enjoy their time as teens...as we know you have alot of time for that responsibility when you are a bit older.

Kim
46 years young

2006-10-02 08:13:11 · answer #5 · answered by queenmackerel 5 · 1 0

each and every cellular has DNA and it rather is consisted of two strands tightly woven around one yet another. the element that forestalls the two strands from breaking aside is termed a telomeric cap (that's random nucleotide sequences referred to as nonsense codons. Codon is a three sequence of nucleotides that codes for amino acids eg. CUU is a amino acid referred to as proline . A nonsense codon is one that doesnt code for any amino acid production) each and every time your cells divide a small sequence is lost there by potential of reducing the steadiness of the cellular's DNA (in layman's words). this might at last lead do maximum of Ur cells' DNA starting to be risky. and oftentimes whilst a mistake happens in DNA the cellular will carry out vehicle cytolysis (cellular suicide) to keep away from issues. So once you're previous maximum of ur cells telomeric caps would be low and that they are services to die whilst they attempt to divide.. Whats rather thrilling approximately this theory is the impact it has on evolution (because of the fact this happens on the two meiotic besides as mitotic divisions. meaning that a species grows previous too earlier it mutates.. yet thats a various tale)

2016-10-15 10:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm 16.

And yes, I think its a good idea. Any 16-year-old who would actually vote in the first place must know what they're doing and have they're logical views, and the ones who don't most likely wouldn't even vote.

2006-10-02 08:03:46 · answer #7 · answered by Omar D 3 · 1 0

I'm 28 and I don't think 16 yr old kids should be allowed to vote that young - wait it out like the rest of us did

2006-10-02 08:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by Rachel 7 · 2 0

I would be against it - sixteen year olds - let me rephrase that - MOST sixteen year olds are not mature enough to make educated decisions. But then again, many adults in America are the same way.

2006-10-02 08:03:01 · answer #9 · answered by Sam 3 · 2 0

I am 42 and at altho 16 isn't far off from 18 I know I wouldn't have been ready to vote personally.......3 words .....Parties, boys, and giggling girlfriends! Good luck on your project take care!

2006-10-02 08:04:09 · answer #10 · answered by crownvic64 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers