The Internet ARchives has been brought to the attention of the Jusitice Department. They are shrouding copies of other people's web sites under their domain name. They are making available to the public material that ONCE was made a vailable to the public but now has often been retracted for a number of reasons - all of which are the business and right of the copyright holder. We do not see how Yahoo can participate IN GOOD CONSCIENCE with these people who are abusing the access the internet provides and hurting, stealing from, millions. Just because walmart puts things within your reach doesn't mean you have the right to take them home without paying for them. THE SAME RULE APPLIES TO THE INTERNET and the Internet Archive is stealing. We will continue to try to stop them and arrest the activities of all who work with them. We won't quit until our intellectual property is protected. Yahoo, you are warned. (shame on you.. this prevents us from being able to support your search engine)
2006-10-02 07:42:48 · 7 answers · asked by Laura M 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Internet
Are you going to sue the encyclopedia companies and dictionary companies as well? I mean the dictionary has been made by many companies and so should they all be sued until the "first" maker is found? Encyclopedias are a collection of information from VARIOUS other sources... should we sue them too because they got their information from someplace else and gathered it into one place for public use? And the MILLIONS of other users out there that have their private pages that contain some "quick tip" or "helpful hint", arent they too then guilty of the same thing?
Is a library guilty because they archive the information from newspapers, magazines, books, etc?
I TOTALLY support copywrite laws, but you are getting carried away.
and your question..... wasnt a question at all but a blatent slam against yahoo to further your purposes.
2006-10-02 07:58:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, before each little thing it really is going to smash no count. what. be confident to apply lube although. And once you're prepared to bypass in, think about to apply extremely of stress together with your penis, (at the same time consenting of direction) because the body's organic reaction is to turn away. it is going to smash, in spite of the indisputable fact that it really is like ripping a bandaid off. The slower you bypass, the better it is going to smash and the longer it is going to smash. after I had sex the first time i became having an truly difficult time, in spite of the indisputable fact that the guy only shoved it in there and it became a lot a lot less complicated that way. and also you is totally no longer "laying on her". Missionary position is optimum for a lady who's a virgin. which will make it a lot less complicated so as that you'll "get in there" And top gained't make a large difference at the same time as it includes sex. the only component you've a align is, properly, you recognize. and when you consider that you adult adult males are both virgins you probable do not recognize, once you're having sex it really is not conceivable to regulate your gas so if it takes position do not enable it destroy some thing. only dismiss it and keep on going.
2016-11-25 22:54:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but making a historical archive available is within the fair use doctrine. Once the copyright holder rings the bell by publishing the content, they can't "un-ring" the bell by claiming that a historically accurate representation of the content is in violation of their copyright.
2006-10-02 07:55:51 · answer #3 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Uh...what's the problem? If you have a problem with someone, take it up with them.
If nothing fruitful happens after that, that's where Courts come in.
If the one who posted that is referring to archive.org, then s/he may have a point. Take it up with them.
If s/he's referring to yahoo's caching, there are court rulings and laws that already addressed this.
2006-10-03 21:28:11 · answer #4 · answered by Dave Zan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok i buy all my products i pay for all of them and just to let you know it is illegal sofware products and illegal copies of all microsoft products, you can blame everyone just coz there are some that do that
your own words ?
We object to your use of the Internet Archive who violates copyright laws hurting millions. Why do you do it?
we not all do it
2006-10-02 07:48:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh get lost will you..it's about time people got some things for nothing..all those copyright owners made there millions ..why do they still care
2006-10-02 07:52:56 · answer #6 · answered by JJ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What do you think Google cache is?
2006-10-02 07:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by boris 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋