...does that take into account that feces can easily be transferred from anus to penis to mouth?
2006-10-02 07:21:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is really, really icky.
2006-10-02 07:23:38 · answer #1 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm not technically a "Dem" but I'll try to answer for them and the "Libs". I don't think it's so much a matter of normal vs. abnormal (though it does occur in other species), as it is a matter of none of our business. If I'm relentlessly hit on by a man or woman who won't take no for an answer I get annoyed. Otherwise, who or what a person chooses to bed down with doesn't concern me. Also I would hope that anyone, gay or straight, who engages in anal sex would be more concerned with the transmission of aids than feces.
2006-10-02 14:34:39 · answer #2 · answered by socrates 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take a gay any day over a fascist..a persons personal sexual preference is their "right" remember those ? Rights for individuals, amazing how the Right decries Libs and progressives wanting to control peoples lives .."liberal-fascists" (oxymoron) and yet they are all about being in the bedroom, wiretapping, and any other form of personal invasion as long as it's behind the guise of terrorism...
what is normal ?
2006-10-02 14:31:20 · answer #3 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all, you are apparently unaware that sodomy extends beyond the gay community, as soap extends into theirs.
Second, it is not according to Dems, it is according to genetic research, observation, and acceptance of reality about humans and other members of the animal kingdom. You're just confused because dems are associated wtih thinking, researching, tolerance.
Also, I wonder if you know that many homophobic people are gay? We know it and we wonder how you feel now.
2006-10-02 14:25:07 · answer #4 · answered by cassandra 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
According to scientists, guy, being gay is indeed normal.
Grab a good biology book and learn about chromosomes. Then, if you would not bash a brown eyed person because of the color of her eyes, don't bash a gay person either for something he has no control over. It is a biological issue, so there's no point debating the morality of it.
2006-10-02 14:23:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
First of all, define normal? Better think of "gay" as a minority in the general population, that's all. Both hetero and homo have to practice clean and safe sex practices.
2006-10-02 15:10:25 · answer #6 · answered by franco5 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marvin Gay is turning in his Grave.Stop using this word.You offend every body with the last name GAY.This is not fair.
2006-10-02 14:43:52 · answer #7 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you LIKE talking about that sort of thing.
Worrying about gays is NOT normal.
Scientific evidence prooves some people are born gay.But no one is born to hate.Republicans use gays to cover up their own issues.
2006-10-02 14:27:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lol.
What if you are straight and a guy and like doing your girlfriend in the ***.The same thing can happen then.
Whats alittle anal sex between grown men? Come on!
2006-10-02 14:23:08 · answer #9 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'VE never met a happy Democrat, so I have to disagree with that statement.
Wanda, there is no gay gene. That is theory, just like evolution and global warming.
2006-10-02 14:24:54 · answer #10 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Of course gay isn't normal.
It is, however, none of the government's business.
2006-10-02 14:24:54 · answer #11 · answered by lunatic 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋