Whilst hardworking people have to go out for a living to provide the things that are essential or luxuries a high number of people on benefits seem to have these items plus much more ie;running a car,sat tv, computers and a free house !Not all claimants I add conform to this as there are many genuine people out there who need our help but its the ones that don't that get my back up!
2006-10-02 07:13:19 · 10 answers · asked by mickey 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I answered a similar question to this the other day .... while i work and havent got a penny to scratch my ar*e with the unemployed get everything ....
Its an unfair system .... personally i think ppl who claim benefits saying they cant find work should be made to work voluntary .. this may actually encourage them to work and earn their own money instead of staying home smoking dope drinking beer and producing future generations of chavs ....
i also think that if u have more than 2 children the government shouldn't pay any more money for these children ... it may actually make people stop and think as to why they want children in the 1st place ...
dont get me wrong i know there are genuine cases out there of people who need the help, i have claimed benefits in my time but it seems its always the genuine people who never get help ! ...
I think the whole system needs an overhaul!
2006-10-02 07:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by jizzumonkey 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No! No all people on welfare have things such as cars, and computers and such. Some people do but have had them and then when things were not so good they got on public assistance but they had already had a car and a computer. Likewise Job and family services helps people get a car if they don't have one. Plus they do programs for students in school and the students get a free dell computer.
Yes there are some people on welfare that can be working and are NOT even out there trying to get a job. Those people don't need to be on welfare.
2006-10-02 07:24:34 · answer #2 · answered by larrys_babygurl_4life 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Welfare should be for a limited time and those people on welfare should be made to work. Some can provide daycare while others go out and clean up the highways...This way there is no free lunch. College should not be freely given to them if it isn't to the tax payers. The tax payers should reap the benefits of their work and then if any is left over then it goes to others. No free school no free lunches everyone can find a job it is just easier to sit at home.
2006-10-02 08:09:12 · answer #3 · answered by chuck 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think job seekers allowance is given away far too freely. After a period of 6 months, people should have to do jobs around their borough ie street cleaning, painting in council run old peoples homes, helping the elderly with simple tasks etc. to earn their money. At the moment all they have to do is take some phone numbers in when they sign on to say they have been looking for work. This is not effective because they deliberately choose jobs that are unsuitable. This might also reduce our council tax bills!!
2006-10-02 07:35:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes my wife and I worked hard for years and now we are retired we both have small pensions but can not even get council tax benefit.But if you have never worked you get money thrown at you,How is that for a slap in the face,also try asking for answers from ex services personnel and i think you would get the same answer.
Yes but John Howard cant give out losers medals very well(Rugby Union)oops.
2006-10-02 08:27:54 · answer #5 · answered by Francis7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all scroungers should be exiled, along with politically correct jobsworths and legal aid lawyers only interested in making money rather than doing the right thing for the right people.
we need a strong right wing government to win back our country, australian immigration and USA welfare reforms have worked there and I can see no reason why they wouldn't work here.
2006-10-02 07:18:55 · answer #6 · answered by phooey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps John Howard,when he is finished being Prime Minister of Australia will come over here and show Blair and his idiotic ministers how to run a country.
2006-10-02 08:40:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that stands proud as the state of Israel. and albeit, that makes me quite indignant. in reality, quite angy is a real understatement. they have had more beneficial sanctions and warnings from the UN than the different us of a, and that all of them ought to do with their remedy of the Palestinians. Why are we helping and allowing state-subsidized terrorism? especially after we are at the moment embroiled in a "warfare on Terror?" that's both disgusting and disgraceful. i imagine we ought to scale back off their reward, and funnel the money elsewhere, like into helping Africa with its AIDS epidemic. AIDS is killing Africa right this moment, and we sit down round and bemoan the actual undeniable reality that it really is so, yet our help to them is measly compared to our help to Israel. Or positioned troops in Darfur, and help there. there are in worry-free words an excellent variety of alternative places that ought to apply our help if we weren't protecting Israel afloat.
2016-10-16 03:11:43 · answer #8 · answered by catharine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes its messed up....especially now when you have 4 and 5 genertations of people living on it.....oh well maybe they will realize its not there for a way of life its there to HELP people who are in need....
2006-10-02 07:21:02 · answer #9 · answered by rhodes727 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
2006-10-02 07:16:20 · answer #10 · answered by melas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋