English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will big corporations eventually make it impossible for the smaller mom-and-pop companies to survive on their own?

2006-10-02 05:59:13 · 10 answers · asked by Aurred 2 in Politics & Government Politics

While also creating a unseen system of socialism for the wealthy?

2006-10-02 06:01:59 · update #1

10 answers

Absolutely assuming the socialists gain power in congress. Currently the majority in congress support a capitalist system, those in the minority seek a socialist system, which is in fact communism/fascism.

The search link below has several good sites and the first one will give you a clue as to who wants us to become a fascist corporate state.

2006-10-06 03:52:30 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

Corporate Communism...

Kind of a paradox my friend but i see what you're getting at.

The answer is no and here's why.

Large business cannot survive without small business in fact 80% of businesses in the US are small businesses and all corporations started out as small businesses to medium sized businesses. Despite the new Global Market (Globalism) small businesses will always be around.

What you're refferring to is an Oligopoly. Big oil is considered an oligopoly (which it is because when talking about big oil you exclude the smaller companies by definition) but even they have small business competition look at 7 Eleven dumping Citgo to produce it's own gas with a smaller firm. Some connect oligopolies to monopolstic competition which is in itself paradoxial. However there are benefits to oligopolies and problems as well.

The most well know oligopoly is the wireless industry. Oil companies can be considered an oligopolistic competition. They can collude to raise prices and restrict production in the same way as a monopoly. Where there is a formal agreement for such collusion, this is known as a cartel. But it would be hard to prove such an action were taking place and although monopolies are illegal (thanks to Teddy Roosevelt in some part) oligopolies are not.

Hope that helps.

2006-10-02 06:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by sprydle 5 · 0 1

It's already happened. We are the 'United States of Corporate America', and our government no longer is "of the people, for the people, and by the people". Corporations dictate to politicians how the country will function, and politicians don't have the gonads to oppose it. "We the PEOPLE..." is now "We the CORPORATIONS..." who control the elections, decide who will even run for office, and browbeat the common citizen into submission.
Smaller mom-and-pop shops are quickly losing ground to mega-corporations.
The military-industrial complex in this country is massive. Ever since World War II, big corporations recognized how profitable war could be, and they bought up all the politicians so that the business of "war" would be continuous. So, we had the Korean Conflict; the Cuban missile crisis; the Cold War; Vietnam; and Desert Storm (along with dozens of other little skirmishes). It's made the military-industrial fat cats really fat - and they're not about to give up all those billions in profits just for the sake of some stupid little idea like world PEACE. They're not about to give up billions in profits just to keep tens of thousands of innocent people and thousands of American soldiers from getting killed. Just as the Greek and Roman empires failed once hubris, greed and arrogance set in, this country is already on a slippery slope toward extinction as a world leader and global peacekeeper, thanks in large part to the cowboy tactics and bullying of the Bush administration. -RKO-

2006-10-02 06:23:02 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 1

My buddy Yuri Yelenko's father became fifty two years old in 1991. whilst the Soviet Union collapsed many older human beings have been very based on government. I first met him one afternoon at 2:00. He became sitting in his arm chair with a bottle of vodka next to it observing his government subject 19" Phillips television. I asked him if he had the day without work artwork. He reported he had no job. not considering 1991, 4 years in the past. I asked him if he became searching for artwork. He reported it became the government's duty to grant him a job. He became a welder. So he at on his butt and waited for somebody to take his hand. everybody have been given their 4 hundred sq. foot house and their table for 2 in the kitchen. some human beings did dishes in the tub. women human beings stood in line for hours getting food rations (like food stamps yet particular). Then we watched government television for an hour and went to artwork on the production unit belching black smoke. for the time of breaks we'd deliver mutually around and examine the two communist newspapers, Izvestia and Pravda. They value a kopek yet we purely made $20 a month. The babushka sweeping the floor, the engineer, the conventional practitioner assigned to the production unit, $20 a month. yet how are you able to whinge once you have cabbage and potatoes and infrequently a ration of sugar and salt? And on the instant, lots of the old human beings nonetheless love the government looking after them. surprisingly everybody knew a worry-free word, despite if in Moscow, or Odessa, or Nizhnevartovsk, Siberia: i'll pretend to artwork, as long as you pretend to pay me! So why do not you youthful "intellectuals" tell me why communism has in no way labored? that would desire to be a stronger question. And once you're at it, possibly you may tell me why communist and fascist States consistently kill approximately 10% of their inhabitants? And why did the Socialist Nirvana, Sweden end paying human beings for artwork, whilst they actually stayed homestead from artwork? i don't understand why your instructors and professors love communism, yet they're liars!

2016-10-18 08:51:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Larger corporations are better for us as they are able to leverage economies of scale to provide us with lower prices. Local store owners complain about not being able to compete simply because they can't compete. And people like you and me (and even small business owners) are the ones who make it impossible for local businesses to compete by doing a vast majority of our shopping at big businesses.
And I am sure that we will hear from plenty of people who never shop at Wal-Mart (etc.) , because Wal-Mart is the multi-billion dollar retailer that noone shops at.

2006-10-02 06:12:29 · answer #5 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 1 0

If our country changed it's name to the Corporate States
of America, it wouldn't surprise me.

2006-10-02 06:06:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If the mom and pop companies just sell out to them and make money then no.

2006-10-02 06:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

"eventually" ?! It's already happening. Talk to a few local small business owners.

2006-10-02 06:02:23 · answer #8 · answered by T S 5 · 1 1

oh they already are....

2006-10-02 06:10:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

NO!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!

2006-10-02 06:01:41 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers