English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Supposedly he only communicated inappropriately with underage pages but, you just KNOW that's not where the story ends.

2006-10-02 05:41:17 · 14 answers · asked by sylvia627 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

This is a non-partisan question. I don't care whether Mr. "Pervy Pervertson" Foley is a Dem, Rep, Lib, Green, or Indy.

2006-10-02 05:43:34 · update #1

It's like that Mark Karr guy...he didn't kill Jon-Benet but, you KNOW he did something to some poor little kids.

2006-10-02 05:49:33 · update #2

14 answers

No it's not unreasonable . He should be forced to live with the bush family for a year , too .

2006-10-02 12:38:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think it would be unreasonable at all. I think all pedophiles should be put to death. But, that is because I believe that anyone who will do inappropriate things with an underage CHILD is not fit to live in society.
I am so sick of Clinton being brought up everytime somebody does something wrong! No, Clinton was not a pedophile! An affair(if you can even call it that) with a consenting adult is much different than being a pedophile!! There is absolutely no comparison. That affair only affected the two people involved and their families, the same as anyone else having an affair. It is wrong, but he is not the first man (or woman) to have an affair. Have you asked your spouse, lately, if he/she has ever had an affair? Oh, that's right though, we both know they wouldn't tell the truth anyway, unless you caught them.
Any man that has an affair is going to lie about it until he has no recourse but to tell the truth. It is up to the wife whether or not to forgive him and she did. Monica got rich because of it, so it was the most lucrative five or ten minutes of her life. She seems to have used it to help her become famous and to make the big bucks( I guess you just have to find out what your talent is and use it to get what you want). So, people enough is enough! Because, I don't know how, but I'm sure that what this pedophile did will be Clinton's fault, just like everything else that happens.

2006-10-02 13:15:39 · answer #2 · answered by georgiapeach 4 · 0 0

Actually he said a lot more than "what do you want for Christmas" - he asked ONE of the KIDS he IMed if he jerked off and what position he was in when he did it. And more stuff I cannot post here.

And let's not confuse Homosexual with Pedophile. If he was after a 16 year old girl it would be the same thing. Gay doesn't matter. Going after young people does matter. How is Child Molester different from Pedophile? It's the same thing.

2006-10-02 16:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by smartbunny 3 · 0 1

No! Hey i hope this opens up a Pandora's box for both parties. Who are up in Washington D.C. living large voting for legislation that they never read or understand, just take the biggest pay off for either ya or nay! I want an end to representative government & replaced by a true Democracy anyway so turn up the heat lets expose how your VOTE DOES NOT COUNT!

2006-10-02 12:45:14 · answer #4 · answered by bulabate 5 · 2 0

This can be a non partisan question all it wants but the fact that he's of a party constantly bashing gay people and even suggesting a constitutional ban on gay marriage makes a difference.
This is hypocrisy on top of the facts which I personally will leave to the courts to judge

2006-10-02 12:48:21 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3 1

Is it unreasonable to have Clinton branded with an A for adulter or Kennedy branded with an M for murderer ?

2006-10-02 12:46:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

A. Has the justice system found him guilty?
B. Does the justice system impose that punishment on anyone else? Does it plan to?

2006-10-02 12:52:06 · answer #7 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0 1

Sure, and brand ALL the rest of the pedophiles while you are at it.

2006-10-02 13:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 0

If not caught, do you think he would have ended it there? Most people become laxed with their behavior when then have not been caught for awhile. And then they push it further.

2006-10-02 12:44:36 · answer #9 · answered by This Is Not Honor 4 · 2 0

Yes, that would probably considered creul and unusual punishment.

Has anyone found out exactly what he said?

2006-10-02 12:44:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers